Implicit Learning of Fifth- and Sixth-Order Sequential Probabilities

By Remillard, Gilbert | Memory & Cognition, October 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Implicit Learning of Fifth- and Sixth-Order Sequential Probabilities


Remillard, Gilbert, Memory & Cognition


Serial reaction time (SRT) task studies have established that people can implicitly learn sequential contingencies as complex as fourth-order probabilities. The present study examined people's ability to learn fifth-order (Experiment 1) and sixth-order (Experiment 2) probabilities. Remarkably, people learned fifth- and sixth-order probabilities. This suggests that the implicit sequence learning mechanism can operate over a range of at least seven sequence elements.

Implicit sequence learning is sequence learning that is not the result of conscious, intentional processes and has been studied using the serial reaction time (SRT) task. On each trial, a target appears at one of a number of locations on a monitor and the key corresponding to the location of the target is pressed. In many cases, the sequence of target locations is deterministic. Sequence learning occurs when the repeating sequence of target locations elicits shorter reaction times (RTs) than does a random or newly introduced sequence of target locations. In other cases, the sequence of target locations is probabilistic. Sequence learning occurs when, given previous target locations, more probable succeeding locations elicit shorter RTs than do less probable succeeding locations.

Most SRT task studies establish implicit sequence learning by assessing awareness of the sequence of target locations. Sequence learning that is explicit (i.e., the result of conscious, intentional processes) would presumably lead to an awareness of the sequence of target locations. Thus, a lack of awareness of the sequence of target locations would suggest that sequence learning was implicit. In many studies, RTs reveal learning of the sequence of target locations, and free recall, cued recall, or recognition tasks reveal no awareness of the sequence (e.g., Curran & Keele, 1993; Lewicki, Hill, & Bizot, 1988; McDowall, Lustig, & Parkin, 1995; Reed & Johnson, 1994; Remillard, 2008a; Remillard & Clark, 2001; Stadler, 1989, 1993, 1995).

Implicit sequence learning involves the extraction of sequential contingencies. Surprisingly, there has been very little systematic investigation into the kinds of sequential contingencies that people can learn implicitly. The overwhelming majority of studies have employed sequences in which the next element in the sequence is predictable from elements one or two trials back, with only a handful of studies having used sequences in which the next element is predictable from elements three trials back. One reason for this state of affairs may be the results of a highly influential study by Cleeremans and McClelland (1991) suggesting that people could not learn to use sequence elements four trials back to anticipate the next element in the sequence.

There are two reasons to believe that people are capable of implicitly learning much more complex sequential contingencies. First, implicit sequence learning, unlike explicit sequence learning, is not bound by the capacity limits of working memory. Implicit sequence learning proceeds independently of individual differences in working memory capacity, whereas explicit sequence learning does not (Frensch & Miner, 1994, Experiment 1; Song, Marks, Howard, & Howard, 2009; Unsworth & Engle, 2005). Also, implicit sequence learning is unaffected by the amount of working memory resources devoted to learning the sequence. This is suggested by studies showing that explicit learning of a sequence is accompanied by parallel implicit learning of the sequence, and the extent of implicit learning is equivalent to that when there is no explicit learning (Song et al., 2009; Song, Howard, & Howard, 2007; Willingham & Goedert-Eschmann, 1999; Willingham, Salidis, & Gabrieli, 2002). Finally, sequence knowledge acquired through explicit learning can be used in a controlled and flexible manner (suggesting the involvement of working memory), whereas sequence knowledge acquired through implicit learning cannot (Jiménez, Vaquero, & Lupiáñez, 2006).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Implicit Learning of Fifth- and Sixth-Order Sequential Probabilities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?