Extending Child Abuse Protection to the Viable Fetus: Whitner V. State of South Carolina

By Coady, Regina M. | St. John's Law Review, Summer 1997 | Go to article overview

Extending Child Abuse Protection to the Viable Fetus: Whitner V. State of South Carolina


Coady, Regina M., St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION Systems of law serve to protect individual rights from unlawful intrusions by the state. Arguably, the most fundamental aspect of such legal regimes is the protection from physical harm. As the most vulnerable members of society, children are guaranteed protection from child abuse inflicted upon them by all adults, including their own parents. The only entity more vulnerable than a child is a fetus. Although an entirely separate being, the fetus is completely dependent upon the woman who conceived it.1 The fetus' inability to protect itself from any type of harm raises the issue of whether those fundamental protections afforded to a child under existing laws should originate before birth. Recently, in Whitner v. State of South Carolina,2 the South Carolina Supreme Court held that a viable fetus was a "person" within the meaning of the Children's Code and could be the victim of criminal child neglect just as any child could after birth.3 It is the scope of such child abuse protection that is presently in dispute.

Cornelia Whitner was a 28-year old woman from Pickens County, South Carolina with a minimal education and a serious drug addiction.4 In 1992, Whitner continued abusing crack cocaine during her third trimester of pregnancy and subsequently gave birth to a child with cocaine residue in his system.5 Whitner, who had prior convictions for theft and cocaine possession,6 was charged with criminal child neglect for using an illicit drug during the later stages of her pregnancy.7 Whitner was sentenced to eight years in prison after her guilty plea, but gained release just nineteen months later when the ACLU learned of her case.8 At that time, a state court judge ruled that the child neglect law did not apply to prenatal drug use and issued an order for Post Conviction Relief for Whitner.9 The South Carolina Supreme Court, however, reinstated Whitner's conviction for criminal child neglect in July of 1996, reversing the prior decision for Post Conviction Relief.10

CHILD ABUSE AND FETAL RIGHTS

The Whitner court held, in a 3-2 decision, that Cornelia Whitner's prenatal drug use constituted criminal child neglect.11 Facing the issue of when a fetus is entitled to protection, the court held that a viable fetus was a "person" for purposes of the Children's Code.12 It is submitted that the Supreme Court of South Carolina correctly decided that a viable fetus was a "person" entitled to protection from criminal child neglect.

The South Carolina Supreme Court rested its position, in large part, upon existing medical information regarding fetal development.13 It is well documented that maternal cocaine use during pregnancy can cause serious harm to the viable fetus.14 The causal connection between Cornelia Whitner's drug use and the injury to her child was not in dispute. The court reasoned that injuries sustained while a fetus is in its mother's womb can often be far more serious than those sustained after birth.15 The Supreme Court of South Carolina interpreted the statute very broadly to encompass all those children, born and unborn, in need of protection.16

Originally, fetal rights were interpreted as merely protecting unborn children from third parties; the legislatures and the courts did not initially imagine the mother as a potential offender.17 The Whitner court boldly defied this antiquated notion, however, to achieve justice for the woman's neglected newborn. Accordingly, the court concluded that Cornelia Whitner was guilty of criminal child neglect.l8

While the use of certain drugs by any person has been criminally actionable throughout the twentieth century,19 accountability for such illicit substances' effects on one's child treads a historically less traveled path but elevates the status of the child inside the womb to that of a child outside the womb. Whitner was a "landmark decision for protecting children,"20 in which the South Carolina Supreme Court became the first state high court in the nation to uphold a conviction of a mother for endangering the life of her fetus through her prenatal conduct. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Extending Child Abuse Protection to the Viable Fetus: Whitner V. State of South Carolina
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.