WHO Participates as Amici Curiae in the U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS?

By Collins, Paul M.; Martinek, Wendy L. | Judicature, November/December 2010 | Go to article overview

WHO Participates as Amici Curiae in the U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS?


Collins, Paul M., Martinek, Wendy L., Judicature


In the past two decades, scholars have made remarkable advancements in the slate of knowledge about the U.S. courts of appeals. We now have a better understanding of the political nature of their stalling1 and the historical transformation that ? belower federal court selection process underwent.- We also have a better grasp on the consequences of the organizational design of diese courts' and their position in the federal judicial hierarchy.' Further, we have a deeper appreciation for the ways in which judges on these courts make law" and how they influence the behavior of other actors.'' In sum, the characterization of the courts of appeals as "among the least comprehended of major federal institutions" is now much less apt a description of the state of knowledge regarding diese courts than it was when Howard penned those words almost 30 years ago.7

This is certainly a welcome development given the opportunity the courts of appeals afford for advancing our understanding of the judiciary beyond what we know from the exclusive focus on the singular institution that is die U.S. Supreme Court. Further, it is a long overdue development in light, of the importance of the courts of appeals as legal institutions in their own right. As Klein demonstrates, these courts make law in meaningful ways, particularly when the Supreme Court has not yet spoken." Moreover, for all practical purposes, the courts of appeals are the appellate courts of last resort in the federal judicial system given how few appeals are disposed of by the Supreme Court and how many appeals are disposed of by the courts of appeals.'

Though the state of knowledge regarding the courts of appeals has grown impressively, it has not grown uniformly; rather, "there continue to be important areas about which we remain stubbornly and conspicuously uninformed.""1 This includes amici in the courts of appeals. Though we know a great deal about amici curiae in the Supreme Court - including the types of groups that Hie amicus briefs, why they participate, die nature of their arguments, and if amicus participation matters for case outcomes" - what we know regarding amici curiae in the courts of appeals is much more limited.'1'

This is unfortunate for several reasons. First, in terms of raw numbers, more amicus participation occurs in the courts of appeals than in the Supreme Conn.1'1 Of course, in terms of the percentage of cases with amicus participation, amici are much more common in die Supreme Court. Nonetheless, the analysis of amici in the Supreme Court stili represents an analysis of the minority of all amici participating in tit e federal system. Second, and more importantly, case history (which includes amicus participation in earlier stages) matters for understanding what trailspires at the Supreme Court level. That is, understanding atnicus activity at the court of appeals level is enormously informative for understanding amicus activity al lhe Supreme Court level.

Indeed, a nontrivial number of amici first enter into the legal ["ray at the court of appeals level. Provided a case is then appealed to the Supreme Court, these amici frequently continue their participation al die certiorari and/or merits stages.M Moreover, recent rest-arch indícales that amicus participation in die courts of appeals plays a substantial role in shaping the Supreme Conn's agenda-setting decisions. For example, in dici r analysis of the Burger Court, Hagle and Spaeth report between one in four and one in five docketed cases with participation by amici in lhe lower court are accepted for review (as compared to lhe mere 1 in 20 peli t ions accepted overall).1' Thus, absent an understanding of amici curiae in the courts of appeals, we are left with only a partial comprehension of this most important interest group litigation strategy. To be sure, understanding amicus curiae participation in the Supreme Court is important, but understanding such participation in that conn should not end die inquiry.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

WHO Participates as Amici Curiae in the U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.