Rape in Conflict, Rape in Peace: Questioning the Revolutionary Potential of International Criminal Justice for Women's Human Rights

By Grewal, Kiran | The Australian Feminist Law Journal, December 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Rape in Conflict, Rape in Peace: Questioning the Revolutionary Potential of International Criminal Justice for Women's Human Rights


Grewal, Kiran, The Australian Feminist Law Journal


1.0 INTRODUCTION

The starting point for this article comes from my own attempts to reconceptualise expectations I had of the international criminal justice project and its ability to deliver genuine positive change to the lives of women both during and after conflict. Working in the area of human rights, I have been involved in various discussions regarding the utility of developments in international justice to the broader women's rights agenda. In 2004 Amnesty International - as part of its Stop Violence Against Women global campaign - issued the campaigning tool, 'Stop Violence Against Women: How to use International Criminal Law to Campaign for Gender-Sensitive Law Reform' and I, along with many other feminist human rights activists and scholars, was committed to the belief that there could be a 'trickle down' effect if we could ensure the International Criminal Court (ICC) promoted progressive definitions and procedures for genderbased violence. As a result, many of the criticisms I make within this paper of those who have asserted the benefits of international criminal justice to women's rights advocacy are as much levelled at myself as others working within this framework.

In fact the question of what exactly international criminal law (ICL) contributes both to societies that have experienced atrocities and to advancing human rights more generally is one of increasing significance as we enter the first decade with a permanent international criminal court. The development of ICL has been fraught with difficulty: between concerns regarding its political legitimacy and the reluctance of various nation-states to endorse its development (most notably the particularly aggressive campaign launched against the ICC by the Bush administration through the promotion of bilateral immunity agreements to limit its jurisdiction), it has had a slow and not-so-steady history. Yet human rights advocates have tended to support its development, arguing that it will give the international human rights framework the 'teeth' it has often been considered to lack. In particular, the positive role international prosecutions can play in recognising and punishing crimes committed against women has become almost an accepted wisdom within much international human rights scholarship and activism.

In this article I seek to challenge this accepted wisdom by asking what purpose such prosecutions serve. Through looking at how crimes of sexual violence have been defined and prosecuted I argue that much of the optimism expressed by proponents of human rights has proven to be misplaced. Moreover, I suggest that it is not simply a matter of 'making the system better' as many feminist legal scholars have demanded. Prosecutions under ICL have required the creation of a distinction between the situation of women in times of war and times of 'peace'. As a result the definition and prosecution of international crimes of sexual and gender-based violence have frequently relied on establishing a certain specificity or peculiarity in terms of the context within which the crimes occurred.

The problem that emerges with this approach is how these prosecutions can then be seen to interact with the broader human rights campaign to improve the lives of women in all situations. How can the claims of human rights advocates regarding the utility of these prosecutions in establishing 'best practice' or international standards of gender competency that can filter down to national law reform be reconciled with the fact that the decisions (and decision makers) themselves are seeking to distinguish between the national and the international character of such crimes? Furthermore, how is the nature of the distinction between national and international crimes against women understood and how does this impact on the utility of ICL to the women's rights as human rights campaign?

2.0 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: TRANSNATIONALISING JUSTICE

As a body of law, international criminal law is relatively new.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Rape in Conflict, Rape in Peace: Questioning the Revolutionary Potential of International Criminal Justice for Women's Human Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?