Kawasaki V. Regal-Beloit: The Supreme Court Resolves the Long-Standing Cbrcuit Split regarding the Law Applicable to Multimodal Shipping Contracts

By Jones, Abbott Marie; Berdy, Christopher | Defense Counsel Journal, January 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Kawasaki V. Regal-Beloit: The Supreme Court Resolves the Long-Standing Cbrcuit Split regarding the Law Applicable to Multimodal Shipping Contracts


Jones, Abbott Marie, Berdy, Christopher, Defense Counsel Journal


This article originally appeared in the December 2010 Environmental, Energy and Maritime Law Committee Newsletter.

As any first-year law student can tell you, federal law governs interstate commerce, such as the carriage of goods by rail. Similarly, federal maritime law governs international and interstate carriage of goods by sea. Which law governs, however, when goods are carried from a foreign port by sea and then inland by rail has long been a point of contention among the Courts of Appeals. The debate has been particularly contentious in situations where goods are carried pursuant to a single contract, which governs both the sea and rail carriage and also extends the application of maritime law to the entire journey. The main question is this: if the goods are damaged during the inland rail carriage, does federal rail-carrier law apply, or does the contractually-extended maritime law apply? That is the question that was presented to the United States Supreme Court in Kawasaki v. Regal-Beloit.

In the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.,1 the Court considered the provisions of through2 bills of lading, which purportedly extended the provisions of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act ("COGSA") to the inland portion of an international, multimodal journey.3 In this maritime case about a train wreck, the petitioners asked the Court to resolve a split among the circuits and consider whether the terms of the through bills of lading, including the contractually extended provisions of COGSA, governed the inland rail carrier's liability, or whether the rail carrier was subject to the provisions of the Carmack Amendment.4

The Court held "that the amendment does not apply to a shipment originating overseas under a single through bill of lading. . . . [Instead], the terms of the bill govern the parties' rights."5 The Court's decision provided long-awaited guidance for shippers and carriers who deal with international and multimodal shipments regularly.

While the decision addresses an important question of maritime law, its biggest impact will be on rail carriers within the United States that are now subject to the provisions of COGSA when the rail carriage is part of a larger, multimodal shipment pursuant to a through bill of lading.

I. International Multimodal Shipments: COGSA and the Carmack Amendment

The Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1 887 governs interstate rail carriers within the United States.6 The Carmack Amendment outlines the basic requirements for liability for "rail carrier[s] providing transportation or service subject to the jurisdiction of the [Surface Transportation] Board under this part."7 With respect to the "jurisdiction of the Board," the Carmack Amendment provides that "the Board has jurisdiction over transportation by rail carrier that is . . . only by railroad; or ... by railroad and water, when the transportation is under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment."8

COGSA governs the international carriage of goods by sea.9 By its terms, COGSA only applies to shipments to or from, but not between, U.S. ports.10 If it does not apply of its own force, COGSA allows parties "the option of extending [certain COGSA terms] by contract" to cover "the entire period in which [the goods] would be under [a carrier's] responsibility, including [a] period of . . . inland transport.""

Pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Norfolk Southern Railway v. Kirby, the provisions of COGSA may be applied by extension when incorporated into a through bill of lading if the sea carriage constitutes a substantial portion of the total shipment.12 Because the bill of lading at issue in Kirby extended COGSA coverage to the entire period of carriage, the Court held that COGSA governed the inland segment of the journey.13 The Kirby Court, however, did not consider the issue of the Carmack Amendment's applicability to the inland leg.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Kawasaki V. Regal-Beloit: The Supreme Court Resolves the Long-Standing Cbrcuit Split regarding the Law Applicable to Multimodal Shipping Contracts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?