Fighting Fraud with Both Fists

By Weisman, Adam; Brodsky, Michael | The CPA Journal, January 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Fighting Fraud with Both Fists


Weisman, Adam, Brodsky, Michael, The CPA Journal


Few people imagined the events of the past two years: case after spectacular case of alleged and actual occurrences of fraud that have shaken not only the financial industry and investor confidence, but also the very core of the global economy. The fallout from the subprime mortgage failure, far-reaching Ponzi schemes, prominent hedge fund closures, and highly publicized SEC and Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations have made it imperative for companies to increase their efforts to combat fraud. Why? Because the potential damage of not addressing fraud risk is so high, including not only the obvious financial risk, but also reputational risk. The mere accusation of wrongdoing in the current fraud-sensitive environment can result in the loss of trust on the part of investors and regulators that a company may never recover from.

Why act now? Because fraud detection and punishment has become a top-of-mind issue for the government, the media, and the public at large. On the federal front, passage of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (FERA) as weU as antifraud provisions in both the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (commonly known as the economic stimulus plan) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the recently enacted healthcare reform legislation), reflects the government's determination to combat fraud. The FERA amends and strengthens the False Claims Act, which protects the government from being deliberately overcharged for goods and services. Once primarily invoked against defense contractors, in recent years, the False Claims Act's most active target has become healthcare fraud.

Even more recently, the 2010 DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act introduces whistleblower provisions that provide monetary rewards of 10% to 30% for information leading to SEC enforcement actions that recover more than $1 million. Given that in July 2010, the SEC settled three securities cases with recoveries of $550 million, SlOO million, and $75 million, respectively, the potential reward for whistleblowers is considerable. For companies, these new financial incentives to report securities law violations create equally strong incentives to prevent such violations in the first place through rigorous internal fraud detection and prevention programs.

These legislative activities are supported by stepped-up enforcement. The SEC reported 671 enforcement actions in fiscal year 2008 (the second highest on record) and 664 in fiscal year 2009 (the third highest) ("SEC Announces Fiscal 2008 Enforcement Results," www.sec.gov/ news/press/2008/2008-254.htm; "FBI Financial Crimes Report to the Public," www.fbi.gov/publications/fmancial/fcs_rep ort2009/financial_crime_2009.htm). The FBI reported nearly 600 open corporate fraud investigations through fiscal year 2009, as well as more than 1,500 pending cases of securities and commodities fraud, nearly 2,800 pending cases of mortgage fraud, and 350 pending cases of money laundering. We believe it's reasonable to expect this brisk enforcement emphasis and activity will continue, if not increase. The DOJ's fiscal year 2010 budget requested "a $62.6 million increase, including 54 agents and 165 attorneys, to aggressively pursue mortgage fraud, corporate fraud, and other economic crimes" (www.justice.gov/jmd/2010summary/pdf/ bud-summary .pdi).

Finally, the magnitude of recent fraud events has drawn heightened media attention, and, in turn, public attention, to such a degree that even the accusation of fraud can pose a serious threat to a company's reputation. An actual investigation of a company by regulatory authorities further raises the threat of reputational damage, even if no wrongdoing is found.

In fact, what constitutes wrongdoing has been an issue in recent investigations. A number of practices in the financial industry, some quite common, have come under intense scrutiny and debate as government investigators, attorneys, investors, and the public at large attempt to clarify what is legal behavior and what is fraud.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Fighting Fraud with Both Fists
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?