Oversight, Enforcement, and Extension in Public-Interest Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Compliance with the Ninth Circuit's Western States Paving V. Washington State Dot Decision

By Luther, Robert | Texas Review of Law & Politics, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Oversight, Enforcement, and Extension in Public-Interest Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Compliance with the Ninth Circuit's Western States Paving V. Washington State Dot Decision


Luther, Robert, Texas Review of Law & Politics


I. INTRODUCTION

For over a century, the words of Justice John Marshall Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson have illuminated the minds of students, teachers, and public officials across the country and the world: "[o]ur Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens."1 In view of this nation's history and the significant policy questions intertwined with public education, it is not hard to understand why the headline Fourteenth Amendment cases of the last decade have concerned the Equal Protection Clause's application to public law schools,2 public undergraduate universities,3 and public grade schools.4

Public contract law, however, is less like the media's darling and more like the redheaded stepchild of law-so much so that even former Chief Justice Rehnquist has described the practice of public-contract procurement as "mundane,"5 and scholarly commentary has concurred with his assessment.6 Nevertheless, much like public education, the practice of public contracting is a vitally important piece of the U.S. economy and is a critical component of Equal Protection Clause jurisprudence. In fact, two of the Court's most influential Equal Protection Clause decisions-City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson, Co.7 and Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena,8-arose from public contract procurement disputes. Thus, as a matter of both significant practical and philosophical importance for those committed to the principle of "Equal Protection under the law," developments in public-contracting law must not go overlooked, just as it must not go overlooked if a government agency secures a contract for the construction or improvement of a public building, road, airport, or implementation of airport concessions in violation of this principle.9

II. THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN SECURING "EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW"

On the other hand, it is often forgotten that litigation is only one of many beneficial services that public-interest legal organizations provide to the public. Long before publicinterest legal organizations file documents in court, they often seek public agency information through federal and state public records access laws in order to become fully informed of the background facts of a potential case. In actively seeking public documents, these organizations are able to determine whether or not federal and state agencies are actually following the law. This often underappreciated oversight function performed by public-interest legal organizations provides an invaluable service to society. A recent example that highlights the significant effect this oversight has had on such agencies in the area of public contracting may be seen through the results of the Sacramento, California-based Pacific Legal Foundation's (PLF or Foundation) Western States Paving Project. To that end, this Article constitutes both an empirical analysis and a five-year retrospective of the Ninth Circuit's Western States Paving v. Washington State Department of Transportation decision.10

III. THE WESTERN STATES PAVING DECISION

In the May 2005 case of Western States Paving Co. v. Washington State Department of Transportation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century ("TEA- 21") violated the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, either on its face or as applied by the state of Washington's Department of Transportation (Washington DOT) when it awarded race- and sex-based preferences to local public contractors.11 The case arose when the owner of Western States Paving Company, a white male contractor, submitted a subcontract bid on a state contract that imposed a 14% minority utilization requirement.12 Western States Paving's bid was not selected "even though its bid was $100,000 less than that of the minority-owned firm that was selected [and] the prime contractor explicitly identified the contract's minority utilization requirement as the reason that it rejected Western States' bid.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Oversight, Enforcement, and Extension in Public-Interest Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of Compliance with the Ninth Circuit's Western States Paving V. Washington State Dot Decision
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?