Multisensor Geophysical Survey Results from the Pine Tree Mound Site: A Comparison of Geophysical and Excavation Data

By Maki, David; Fields, Ross C. | Southeastern Archaeology, Winter 2010 | Go to article overview

Multisensor Geophysical Survey Results from the Pine Tree Mound Site: A Comparison of Geophysical and Excavation Data


Maki, David, Fields, Ross C., Southeastern Archaeology


A multisensor geophysical investigation of portions of the Pine Tree Mound site (41HS15) located in Harrison County, Texas, was conducted prior to large-scale block excavations there. The investigation included electrical resistance, magnetic field gradient, and ground-penetrating radar surveys. The geophysical survey and subsequent excavations were undertaken in an effort to mitigate the effects of coal mining operations on the site. This article presents the results of our geophysical investigations and describes an online data analysis tool created with the intention of simplifying interpretation of these complex multivariate data and making these data available to a broad audience. The article also compares the geophysical signal response with excavation results from the site. Sources of uncertainty in both data sets are discussed, and possible reasons for observed incongruities between the geophysical and excavation data are explored. We end by making recommendations for innovative ground truthing methods that might allow us to more definitively interpret geophysical data in the future.

Introduction

Early in 2006 Archaeo-Physics, LLC was contracted by Prewitt and Associates, Inc. to conduct a geophysical investigation at the Pine Tree Mound site (41HS15), a Caddo archaeological site located in Harrison County, Texas. Geophysical methods were used to evaluate two areas of the site that were slated for archaeological data recovery prior to portions of the site being destroyed by coal (lignite) mining operations. The objective of the investigation was to identify geophysical anomalies and anomalous patterning indicative of the presence of archaeological features and /or landscape modifications associated with the Caddo occupation.

Multiple geophysical methods were employed during the investigation, including magnetic field grathent, electrical resistivity, and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). Geophysical fieldwork was conducted between February 10-14, 2006. Parts of the Pine Tree Mound site were subsequently excavated during 2006 by Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Because each of the geophysical methods applied during this investigation responds to contrasts in different material properties, each individual method provides only a partial or limited understanding of the subsurface archaeological record. The view provided by each method is limited further when additional issues inherent to most real world geophysical survey situations are considered. For example, signal noise caused by system electronics, environmental conditions, and operator error can limit the visibility of buried archaeological resources. Signal clutter is often an even more significant source of uncertainty. It can be caused by modern trash (e.g., metal pin flags), modern disturbance (e.g., plowing, terracing, trenching), natural horizontal or vertical heterogeneity in the site's soils, and the presence of natural inclusions within the soil (e.g., stones with significant magnetic remanence). These three issues - limited signal contrast, signal noise, and signal clutter - often result in significant uncertainties when interpreting geophysical data from pre-contact Native American sites.

In a similar manner, there is often considerable uncertainty associated with the excavation and mapping of archaeological features. This is especially true in salvage archaeology situations where mechanical methods are utilized to explore large areas and time and budget constraints must be considered. Although many buried archaeological features are highly visible and easy to interpret, we believe most field archaeologists would agree that features often grade into ambiguity, and the mapping and recording of such features can be very subjective and challenging. With these many sources of uncertainty in mind, the archaeological record at a large and complex site such as the Pine Tree Mound site is best understood by carefully comparing all available sources of data. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Multisensor Geophysical Survey Results from the Pine Tree Mound Site: A Comparison of Geophysical and Excavation Data
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.