The Relationship between Defense Spending and Economic Growth in the United States

By Heo, Uk | Political Research Quarterly, December 2010 | Go to article overview

The Relationship between Defense Spending and Economic Growth in the United States


Heo, Uk, Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

Recent increases in U.S. defense spending have renewed interest in the defense-growth nexus. The Feder-Ram-based models have traditionally been used in examining this relationship, but Dunn, Smith, and Willenbockel recommend the augmented Solow model because of several weaknesses inherent in the Feder-Ram model (including its static nature, simultaneity bias, and multicollinearity issues). The augmented Solow model addresses these issues, but it has weaknesses too. Thus, by employing both the Feder-Ram and augmented Solow models, the author tests the defense-growth nexus in the United States for 1954 through 2005. The results indicate that defense spending does not significantly affect the U.S. economy.

Keywords

Defense Spending, Economic Growth, Feder-Ram Based Model, Augmented Solow Model, United States

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)

The Defense-Growth Nexus in the United States

The annual budget for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) in fiscal year (FY) 2006 was approximately $419.3 billion. This was a 4.8 percent boost from the previous year. However, this increase in defense spending in FY 2006 was not an isolated case in the recent past. According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), defense spending from 2001 to 2006 increased by 41 percent (OMB 2006; see also Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post, February 6, 2007). The DOD's base budget for FY 2007 was $439.3 billion. An additional $50 billion was also provided to support the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (OMB 2007). These increases in defense spending are the largest since the Reagan administration.

According to former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, these increases are necessary because "when the Cold War ended, a defense drawdown took place that went too far . . . [and] overshot the mark. Now, through the prism of September 11, we can see that challenge is not simply to fix the underfunding of the past" (New York Times, February 5, 2002). He went further by saying that a "decade of overuse and underfunding" requires catch up to meet all the demands the military is currently facing since "we are a nation at war" (DOD 2005).

During the same period (2001-2006), the average annual economic growth rate was a mere 2.4 percent (Bureau of Economic Analysis's National Economic Accounts; see http://www.bea.gov/National/nipaweb/Index.asp) and the national debt went from $5.8 trillion to $8.6 trillion (Treasury Department n.d.). Coincidentally, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that continuing twin deficits (the budget and trade deficits) along with record-breaking debt increases in the United States threaten the financial stability of both the U.S. and global economies (Elizabeth Becker and Edmund Andrews, New York Times, January 8, 2007). Moreover, slow economic growth is expected in coming months for various reasons (Joanne Morrison, Reuters, November 28, 2007).

Are recent increases in defense spending for the war on terrorism one of the reasons for slower economic growth? Despite the volume of studies on the defense- growth relationship, there is no consensus about the relationship between defense spending and economic growth in the United States. Some scholars argue that defense spending in the United States helps growth (e.g., Atesoglu 2002; Atesoglu and Mueller 1990; Mehay and Solnick 1990; Mueller and Atesoglu 1993), while others contend that the indirect, delayed, negative effects of defense spending on the U.S. economy are greater than the positive ones (e.g., Goldstein 1988; Heo and Eger 2005; Mintz and Huang 1990, 1991; Ward and Davis 1992; Ward, Davis, and Lofdahl 1995).

What are the causes of different empirical findings on the U.S. defense-growth nexus? According to Dunne, Smith, and Willenbockel (2005), the reason previous studies found positive or negative relationships between defense spending and economic growth is because they used various versions of the Feder-Ram-based defense-growth model.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Relationship between Defense Spending and Economic Growth in the United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.