Barry and Kukathas as Inspiring Sources for a Fair Church-State System in Belgium

By Franken, Leni; Loobuyck, Patrick | Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, Spring 2011 | Go to article overview

Barry and Kukathas as Inspiring Sources for a Fair Church-State System in Belgium


Franken, Leni, Loobuyck, Patrick, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies


Abstract: In this article, we will look at the political philosophical theories of Brian Barry (Culture and Equality, 2001) and Chandran Kukathas (The Liberal Archipelago, 2003) and see which consequences both theories have for the Belgian model of church and state. For both authors, the liberal state should be neutral toward religion but they interpret this neutrality in a different way. According to Kukathas, neutrality implies a hands-off policy and therefore, recognizing and financing religions is out of the question. For Barry on the other hand, the state is neutral if equal people have equal opportunities. Consequently, state support for religions and even the recognition of religions is possible, if religions are treated in the same way. However, a hands-off policy is also in line with Barry's theory. Both from a pragmatic and from a normative point of view, Barry's egalitarian liberalism seems the most interesting theory as an inspiring source for the evolvement and modification of the Belgian system, towards more fairness and equality.

Key Words: Barry, Kukathas, egalitarian liberalism, libertarianism, recognized religions, religious education, church and state policy, Belgium, equality, neutrality

Introduction

In this article, we will apply egalitarian liberalism and libertarianism to the church and state relations in Belgium and we will look at the consequences of both theories for the actual Belgian system. We have chosen for Brian Barry1 and Chandran Kukathas2 because they give much attention - much more than their predecessors (respectively Rawls / Dworkin and Nozick) have done - to the consequences of their liberal theory for diverse cultures and religions. Both authors are of interest because they can be seen as opposites within liberal theory, in particular when they are talking about the role of political government. Undoubtedly, this will also lead to different opinions about the legitimacy of church and state relations.

In a first part of this article, we will elaborate the Belgian church and state relations. Next, both positions of Barry and Kukathas will be explored. In another part, we will see how these positions would deal with the Belgian system where some religions get recognition and active state support. Finally, we will evaluate both theories and see how they could be used within the discussion about the Belgian church and state regime. A verification of the Belgian system to both opposite political philosophical theories may be helpful to chose a position concerning the future Belgian state and church policy. We will conclude with both pragmatic and normative reasons in favour of Barry's theory over Kukathas', for Barry's theory could at least give the opportunity to make the Belgian system fairer, without losing sight of the very specific, historical context.

Church and State in Belgium

In Belgium, the separation between church and state is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. The Belgian church and state regime is not characterized by separationism or by radical and assertive secularism3, but by moderate secularism4, favourable neutrality5 or accomodationism6. The Belgian state has not chosen for a hands-off policy, but for an "actively supported religious pluralism, that results in an effective benefit of the freedom of religious worship".7

The Belgian church and state regime is clearly the product of Belgian history. Since 1825, both liberals and Catholics opposed the protestant King Willem I's meddlesome policy on the subject of religion and education. A monstrous alliance between both parties has led to the Belgian independence in 1830 and formed the basis for one of the most liberal constitutions of that time: in this constitution, freedom of religion, organization and education is explicitly mentioned. In addition, this constitution of 1831 formed the basis for an active support of religion, which was, in that period, almost only Catholicism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Barry and Kukathas as Inspiring Sources for a Fair Church-State System in Belgium
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.