Overturning Health Reform: What's Really at Stake?

By Lazarus, Simon | Aging Today, January/February 2011 | Go to article overview

Overturning Health Reform: What's Really at Stake?


Lazarus, Simon, Aging Today


Nearly a year after President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law, baffles over its constitutionality continue to flare up in several separate lawsuits, and in countless media and political arenas. Those who work in the field of aging should carefully monitor the outcomes of these cases: they could result in the denial of health coverage to nearly half of all older adults between ages 55 and 64, and threaten other benefit programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

While Congress was drafting the health reform law, opponents first broached the prospect of constitutional challenges. Experts derided the constitutional case against the legislation as "preposterous," in the words of Harvard's Charles Fried, Solicitor General to President Ronald Reagan.

Thus far, most cases have been dismissed, and two of the federal district courts have upheld the principal target of the challenges - the "individual mandate" or "minimum coverage provision" requirement that most Americans who can afford it should carry health insurance. However, one district court has struck the mandate down and another overturned the entire law. So the staying power of health reform is very much at risk.

Ultimately, the issue will be resolved by the Supreme Court, perhaps at the end of two years. Key members of the Court's conservative bloc have written major opinions that would be hard to square with disapproval of the mandate or other ACA provisions under challenge. But the current Supreme Court, in its handling of politically or ideologically charged cases, has a track record of giving precedent short shrift and splitting five-to-four along partisan lines. So precedent may not be prologue in this case.

CHALLENGES TAKE AIM AT DEMOCRACY

Beyond the targeted ACA provisions, consider the following two salvos to the foundations of constitutional law - which is what really is at stake in these cases:

Pending health-reform challenges constitute a bold bid for historic, sweeping constitutional change. If successful, the challenges would be a major step toward "restoring" a constitution that tightly constrains congressional regulatory authority. Some proponents of the lawsuits claim this authority was "lost" in the late 1930s and early 1940s when the Supreme Court adopted constitutional interpretations supporting the expansion of federal regulation of the national economy engineered by Progressive Era, New Deal, Great Society and kindred reforms.

Legal theories behind these lawsuits take dead aim at three bedrock understandings that inform the vision of a democratically governed, economically robust nation-state. These bedrocks have shaped American constitutional law not only since the New Deal era, but since the drafting of the Constitution's provisions allocating governmental power to make national economic policy - and to Chief Justice John Marshall's interpretation of these provisions in the first third of the 19th century. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Overturning Health Reform: What's Really at Stake?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.