How Much Do You Really Have to Know?: An Analysis of the Mens Rea Requirement of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2)

By Ennis, Kirsten | St. John's Law Review, January 1, 2010 | Go to article overview

How Much Do You Really Have to Know?: An Analysis of the Mens Rea Requirement of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2)


Ennis, Kirsten, St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

The average American is undoubtedly familiar with the decongestant Sudafed. Often employed to treat symptoms of the common cold and allergies, Sudafed is a household name. When most people purchase Sudafed at their local drug store, however, they are often unaware that their fellow customers may not be buying the medicine to nurse their cold symptoms. In fact, many are not aware of the black market that exists for Sudafed. The active ingredient in Sudafed, pseudoephedrine, is used in the manufacturing of methamphetamine, a highly addictive, illegal stimulant that typically causes neurological damage in its users.1 Methamphetamine producers often purchase bulk quantities of pseudoephedrine, and the DEA is currently unaware of any other legitimate or black market use for large amounts of pseudoephedrine.2 To ensure that lawful chemicals that are readily available, such as pseudoephedrine, are not diverted into illegal channels such as methamphetamine production, Congress enacted 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2). This statute criminalizes the possession or distribution of certain chemicals when the defendant knew, or had reasonable cause to believe, that such chemicals would be used to manufacture a controlled substance.3

A well-established maxim in criminal law is actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea, "an act does not make [its doer] guilty, unless the mind be guilty."4 It is axiomatic in American criminal jurisprudence that punishment is proper only when an individual has committed the physical act and had the mental state required by the statute defining the crime.5 Certain crimes require that the defendant intended the result of his physical act, predicating conviction on the defendant's subjective, or actual, objectives.6 Other crimes, however, focus on the mindset of the reasonable person in the defendant's situation, allowing the prosecution to prove guilt based upon objective knowledge.7 When drafting statutes, Congress often includes more than one requisite mental state, or mens rea; in such a case, a defendant may be found guilty if he possessed either of the named mentes reae.8 Title 21, section 841(c)(2) is one such statute, criminalizing the possession or distribution of certain chemicals when the defendant knew, or had reasonable cause to believe, that the chemicals would be used to manufacture a controlled substance.9 Black market sellers of pseudoephedrine, or other chemicals used to make controlled substances, can be convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2) if they do so knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that their purchasers will use the chemicals to produce a controlled substance.10

To answer the question of whether a particular defendant violated 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2), a court must ascertain the meaning of the requisite mens rea: "knowing or having reasonable cause to believe." Specifically, the court must determine whether this phrase implicates an entirely subjective standard or, instead, allows a defendant's conviction to be based on either subjective or objective knowledge of his purchaser's intent. This decision is often crucial in whether a defendant is found guilty, as a defendant who only possessed objective knowledge would be innocent in a jurisdiction that adopts a wholly subjective standard; the same defendant, however, would be convicted in a court that holds that guilt may be predicated on objective fault.11 Currently, the circuit courts have failed to adopt a uniform understanding of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2)'s mens rea.12 A consistent interpretation is needed to ensure that a defendant's guilt or innocence is not determined simply by the court in which he is tried.

The varying interpretations of the mens rea of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2) have been at issue in the circuit courts for a number of years. While one circuit has held that the standard is wholly subjective, others have ruled that the statute's language allows for either a subjective or objective finding of knowledge on the part of the defendant, and one circuit has failed to adopt a conclusive stance on the issue. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Much Do You Really Have to Know?: An Analysis of the Mens Rea Requirement of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.