Online Publication of Corrections and Clarifications May Have Legal Ramifications

By Rasmussen, Kristen | News Media and the Law, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Online Publication of Corrections and Clarifications May Have Legal Ramifications

Rasmussen, Kristen, News Media and the Law

Alteration of copy could trigger new statute of limitations

Evolution in the news industry and the modern trend of posting content to the Internet have changed many aspects of the information dissemination process, including one that may not come to mind right away: corrections and clarifications.

Yet, the way in which corrections and clarifications are handled in the online context could have legal significance for media organizations sued for defamation based on a corrected or clarified story.

The issue centers on the statute of limitations, which determines how much time a potential plaintiff has to bring a particular cause of action. The rationale underlying the policy is simple: Potential defendants should not have to defend against claims brought years, or even decades, after the allegedly wrongful conduct. The time limit also prevents old cases from clogging the courts and promotes fairness by eliminating threats of future suits.

The statute of limitations for defamation varies by state from one to three years. Courts' strict application of limitations periods - meaning plaintiffs who do not bring their suits within the time period are barred from doing so - is particularly important in cases involving the media because of the chilling effect caused by an indefinite threat of liability.

Here is how the dilemma usually arises: A news story appears in print and is also posted to the publication's website, usually on the same day or the day before. Later that day, the editorial staff is informed of an inaccuracy, and an appropriate correction or clarification is posted to the online version of the story and printed in the next day's edition. This scenario generally does not present statute of limitations problems because the allegedly defamatory story, in both the print and online versions, and the online correction or clarification were published within the same 24-hour news cycle.

The more troublesome situation occurs when the editorial staff is notified of an inaccuracy a significant amount of time after the original publication of the work.

Does adding a correction or clarification to the article in the organization's online archives constitute a republication of that article such that the statute of limitations begins to run anew from the date of the correction, thereby exposing the publisher to an additional period of potential liability for allegedly defamatory statements contained in the earlier published story?

The answer depends on the format in which the correction or clarification is added, said Slade Metcalf, a New York media attorney. If the surrounding copy and context of the article as a whole remain the same as its original publication, the majority of courts will hold that such an addition is not a republication of the work and, thus, its original limitations period still applies, he said.

"If [the editorial staff] merely adds a correction at the end of a publication, the statute [of limitations] has not begun to run again. They haven't altered the meaning of the article itself," Metcalf said. "But if [the editor] is going in and changing the allegedly defamatory statement to make it not defamatory now, you have changed [the article], and the statute will [re] start.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Online Publication of Corrections and Clarifications May Have Legal Ramifications


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?