Slouching towards Sodom

By DeMarco, Donald | The Human Life Review, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

Slouching towards Sodom


DeMarco, Donald, The Human Life Review


On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court, in its Gonzales v. Carhart decision, upheld a ban on partial-birth abortion. In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg complained that the ruling treated sympathetically such traditional notions as "the bond of love a mother has for her child." Ginsburg believes, uncompromisingly, in a woman's "autonomy" and "privacy."

Abortion would be finally free of all controversy if only human beings could be seen as purely individual entities that bear absolutely no affiliation with any other human beings. But affiliations persist, despite consistent attempts to deny, dissolve, or degrade them. The very word "affiliation," in fact, bears testimony to the normalcy of parent-to-child sympathies. "Affiliation" is derived from affiliatus, past participle of affiliare, meaning to adopt a son (filius = son; filia = daughter).

If unborn life must be denied, its incriminating witness, language, must be denied along with it. Even the apparently politically correct term "compassion" must go. In Hebrew, the word for womb is rechem, which is also the root for the word "compassion." Accordingly, a mother naturally has compassion for her child that has dwelled in her womb. Nonetheless, motherly feelings aside, Justice Ginsburg states that "the destiny of me woman must be shaped ... on her own conception of her spiritual imperatives and her place in society." And such an "imperative" might be one of a radical individualism that harbors no concern for anyone else.

The one philosopher who has best depicted the human being as absolute individuality and privacy is Ludwig Wittgenstein. In his Tractatus he sees man, as well as everything else, solely in terms of so many logical atoms that have no relationship with each other. Thus, he declares: "Any one fact can either be the case, or not be the case, and everything else remains the same."

We will put aside the metaphysical conundrum of how a "fact" can not be the case. In response to Wittgenstein's proposition, the distinguished philosopher William Barrett, in The Illusion of Technique, rightly finds it to be "an astounding statement to fling in the face of our ordinary experience ___ Connectedness is more generally the case than not. One fact does make a difference to others; and if certain facts did disappear, it seems to me that everything else would surely not remain the same." Indeed! If my mother never existed (if the fact of her being was not the case), would my existence not be affected? If the fact that an unborn child is no longer the case, does the aborting mother remain completely unaffected? An abundance of women have come to regret their decision to abort. Their public testimonies indicate that abortion has not left them unaffected.

Perhaps the root of the problem is the very word "child," which denotes an intrinsic relation to a parent. Ginsburg and her Planned Parenthood affiliates would prefer to define "child" in Wittgensteinian terms as a fact that is or is not the case without affecting anything else. A lost child, therefore, is one that is equivalent to one that never was. Why then, as the majority stated in Gonzales v. Carhart, do "women who have abortions come to regret their choices, and consequently suffer from '[s]evere depression and loss of esteem'"? Perhaps it does not happen. According to Ginsburg, the majority "has no reliable evidence" for claiming that such negative sequelae could happen to aborting women.

Redefining human beings as disconnected and essentially unrelated to others, however, has dire consequences. Non-relatedness, as psychiatrists have amply elucidated, is a psychiatric disorder. The attempt to justify partial-birth abortion by denying the importance of the sympathetic bond between mother and child is also an attempt to multiply the number of psychiatric disorders in society.

A college student is quoted as saying that he wants abortion to remain legal because he does not like using condoms.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Slouching towards Sodom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.