The Potential for Bias in Capital Juries

By Gonzalez-Perez, Margaret | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Potential for Bias in Capital Juries


Gonzalez-Perez, Margaret, Justice System Journal


Note on Research

The Potential for Bias in Capital Juries*

In recent years, the death penalty has grown more popular with the general public. According to Gallup Polls, 66 percent of Americans favor capital punishment for those convicted of murder (Gallup, 2000). Other survey research indicates that as much as 80 percent of the general public supports the death penalty (Borg, 1997; Fox, Radelet, and Bonsteel, 1990-91; Moore, 1994:4; Young, 1992). This development has led scholars to wonder if these attitudes extend to bias in capital juries.

This study explores the issue of potential bias in capital juries and attempts to identify the correlates of juror attitudes about the death penalty in two Louisiana parishes: East Baton Rouge and Tangipahoa. While both parishes are located in the southeastern area of the state, East Baton Rouge is more densely populated and is the seat of government for the state. Tangipahoa's population is more widely distributed and more rural than that of East Baton Rouge. Despite these differences, both parishes yielded similar population characteristics in this study. Sixty-seven percent of the Tangipahoa population indicated support for the death penalty, compared to 65 percent in East Baton Rouge. In Tangipahoa, 8 percent of respondents identified themselves as liberal and 49 percent as conservative, while 13 percent of East Baton Rouge respondents identified themselves as liberal and 39 percent as conservative. Partisan identification was very similar, with Tangipahoa yielding 46 percent Democrat and 37 percent Republican; East Baton Rouge was 43 percent Democrat and 38 percent Republican. Income levels were comparable, as well, with a mean of $32,556 in Tangipahoa and $37,530 in East Baton Rouge. Race distributions differed, as Tangipahoa yielded a population of 82 percent white and 18 percent black, while East Baton Rouge was 66 percent white and 33 percent black (Mitchell, 1998; Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1998; Southern Media and Opinion Research, 1996).

Research Framework

As stated previously, recent polls indicate that between 74 and 80 percent of Americans favor the death sentence over life imprisonment (Borg, 1997; Fox, Radelet, and Bonsteel, 1990-91; Moore, 1994:4; Young, 1992). In one of the study sites, East Baton Rouge Parish, similar patterns have been noted. For example, from 1977 to 1989, jurors handed down life sentences in 86 percent of the first-degree murder trials and voted for the death penalty in only 13 percent of the cases.1 Yet from 1990 to 2001, jurors chose the death penalty for 94 percent of the first-degree murder cases and voted for life sentences in only 6 percent of these trials (District Attorney's Office of East Baton Rouge Parish current records). These numbers illustrate not only a shift in favor of the death penalty, but a virtual reversal in the propensity to vote for life sentences versus capital punishment. Shifts in both support for capital punishment and jury decisions in capital cases prompt this study of potential jury bias.

Social science recognizes religious practice as one of the most powerful influences on attitudes that tie into juror bias. Allport and Ross found that religious practice correlates highly with authoritarian attitudes, political intolerance, conservatism, and racial bias (Allport and Ross, 1967; Rokeach, 1969, 1970). In this research, churchgoers exhibited more racial bias than those who did not attend church, and the intensity of bias increased with the frequency of church attendance. In similar studies, Baptists and Christian fundamentalists demonstrated greater political conservatism and intolerance than all other denominations, leading researchers to conclude that "those who are highly and indiscriminately religious are very authoritarian with a higher tendency toward punitiveness and racial bias" (Russell, 1994:80; Erikson, Luttberg, and Tedin, 1988).

Social psychology research contends that people who exhibit these punitive attitudes and a bias toward conviction also favor the death penalty (Russell, 1994:85; Moran and Comfort, 1986; Bronson, 1970, 1981; Haney, 1980; Jurow, 1971). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Potential for Bias in Capital Juries
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.