The Availability of Damages in the EUROPEAN UNION for Breach of the Arbitration Agreement

By Sievi, Nino | Dispute Resolution Journal, February-April 2011 | Go to article overview

The Availability of Damages in the EUROPEAN UNION for Breach of the Arbitration Agreement


Sievi, Nino, Dispute Resolution Journal


An issue of great interest in view of the unavailability of anti-foreign-suit injunctions in the EU.

Clauses providing that any dispute shall be referred to an arbitral tribunal are nothing special in international commercial contracts. However, some parties decide to breach the arbitration clause, perhaps believing that it might stand a better chance before its home court, or that it might gain time by doing so.1

An efficient remedy to prevent the continuation of such a breach in the European Com - munity (EC) is an anti-foreign-suit injunction, which prevents a party from continuing a foreign court proceeding so that arbitration can take place. However, in Allianz SpA v. West Tankers,2 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it is incompatible with Regula tion 44/2001 (known as Brussels Regulation I), and inconsistent with the arbitration agreement, for a court of an EC member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the court of another member state. This means that once a party has started proceedings at a court of an EC member state-even if in breach of an arbitration agreement-the nonbreaching party cannot ask any other court in an EC member state to order an anti-suit injunction. Hence, that party is forced to file an application with the foreign court asking for a dismissal or a stay of the proceedings on the ground that the arbitration agreement is binding and should be enforced.

Only in rare cases will a dismissal be denied, e.g., when non-parties to the arbitration agreement are involved in the dispute. However, foreign proceedings can be very time consuming and costly for the non-breaching party. Hence, in this situation the question arises as to whether the party that breaches the arbitration agreement can be held liable for the costs incurred by the non-breaching party in seeking to enforce the arbitration clause in the foreign court.

European Rule on Recovery of Costs

Unlike in the United States, where the prevailing party generally cannot recover its litigation costs from the losing party, in most European countries, the losing party bears the costs of the proceedings. Thus, theoretically, a prevailing party would not incur any damages through the foreign proceedings. However, empirical studies have shown that decisions on costs awarded to the prevailing party only rare ly cover all costs of the prevailing party.3 One reason could be that the law of the jurisdiction where the breaching party commenced the lawsuit might not allow the court to award full compensation for costs. For example, in a German case, the court held that a party could not recover all costs incurred in that proceeding as the hourly fee charged by the foreign lawyer was much higher than German law allows.4 Therefore, a prevailing party will be eager to recover in the arbitration the costs not awarded by the foreign forum. The only way to recover this cost in the arbitration is to make a claim for damages for breach of the arbitration agreement.

This article discusses the availability of an award of damages for breach of an arbitration agreement, whether such an award would comply with the Brussels Regulation, and the enforceability of that award.

Remedy for Breach of an Arbitration Agreement

Various courts and arbitral tribunals have awarded damages for breach of an arbitration agreement. The strongest argument for allowing an award of damages for breach of an arbitration agreement is pacta sunt servanda (meaning agreements must be kept). This is a fundamental principle of European law.5 An arbitration clause is basically a contractual promise by the parties that, in case a dispute arises, they will select an arbitral tribunal and submit the dispute to that tribunal for a binding decision. However, by filing a claim in court, instead of with the arbitral tribunal, a party breaches that promise.6 Hence, commencing a legal action in any forum other than the one agreed on constitutes a breach of contract for which damages should be available. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Availability of Damages in the EUROPEAN UNION for Breach of the Arbitration Agreement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.