State Judicial Elections' Impact on Participation in Direct Democracy*

By Reilly, Shauna; Walker, Carol | Justice System Journal, May 1, 2010 | Go to article overview

State Judicial Elections' Impact on Participation in Direct Democracy*


Reilly, Shauna, Walker, Carol, Justice System Journal


This article examines how the presence of judicial elections on the ballot impacts voter participation on direct democracy measures affecting justice. Ballot roll-off occurs on judicial elections and direct democracy measures for similar reasons. We explore the linkage between judicial elections and direct democracy measures based on theory indicating that ballot measures affect other races on the ballot, particularly when these measures involve specific issues, and the impact of different selection methods on ballot roll-off. To explore this relationship, we analyze 1,259 different ballot propositions from 1998 to 2007 in forty-one different states, with varying judicial selection methods. We find there is increased roll-off for direct democracy measures when there are judicial elections on the ballot, but less ballot roll-off for direct democracy measures when these measures have connecting topics. Further, because of the impact and electoral consequences of different judicial selection methods we expect differences in roll-off for these different selection methods.

How does the presence of judicial elections impact participation in direct democracy measures? How is participation impacted when direct democracy measures concerning the judiciary are on the same ballot as a judicial election? Previous research explored citizen participation and levels of ballot roll-off for judicial elections and direct democracy measures independent of one another (Dubois, 1979; Taebel, 1975; Darcy and Schneider, 1989; Bullock and Dunn, 1996; Hall, 1999). The same factors contribute to ballot roll-off on judicial elections and direct democracy measures; however, there have been no studies to determine if there exists an interconnected relationship between these types of ballot measures to voters. Judicial elections and direct democracy generally suffer from high occurrences of ballot roll-off, and the reasons voters fail to make a selection on these measures are similar. Both elections offer few partisan cues and generally low- salience issues while receiving low placement on the ballot.

Both judicial and direct democracy elections require more knowledge and engagement of the citizen for participation (Klein and Baum, 1988; Sheldon and Lovrich, 1999) than traditional representative elections. These additional requirements on the voter place a burden that dissuades many from voting on these measures, resulting in ballot roll-off. Ballot roll-off is the difference in the votes cast for major offices and for those further down the ballot, in this case judicial elections and propositions. Ballot propositions allow the public to participate directly in the lawmaking process. However, propositions generally suffer from high levels of ballot roll-off as there is a significant decrease in votes cast as one moves down the ballot, and ballot propositions are traditionally located at the bottom of electoral ballots.

Direct democracy elections are a subset of elections that are subject to the same limitations as other elections (campaigns, financial components, sponsorship, etc.). They also provide an additional dilemma to the electoral agenda as the repercussions of these elections can be substantial but their salience low. Citizens must live with the consequences, yet few are aware of the issue or the consequences of the matter at hand. Direct democracy, in its ideal, provides the citizenry the opportunity to voice their opinions and directly contribute to the operation of state government.

This study seeks to explore ballot roll-off from an institutional perspective. Central to democratic theory is that voting increases government accountability to the people. Judicial elections and direct democracy measures exist to enhance voter engagement in these areas of government. However, even when voters head to the polls, they often fail to cast a ballot on these measures, weakening their contribution to democratic participation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

State Judicial Elections' Impact on Participation in Direct Democracy*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.