Counting Cases about Milk, Our "Most Nearly Perfect" Food, 1860-1940

By Wright, Ronald F.; Huck, Paul | Law & Society Review, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

Counting Cases about Milk, Our "Most Nearly Perfect" Food, 1860-1940


Wright, Ronald F., Huck, Paul, Law & Society Review


At the turn of the 20th century, as more people in the United States started moving to urban areas, the quality of the milk supply became one of the preeminent public health challenges of the day and a centerpiece of the Progressive agenda. Governments passed ordinances and statutes to safeguard the milk supply and sanctioned violators of these laws. This study collects the published cases where judges were asked to enforce these health regulations.

Contrary to the Revisionist reading of Progressive Era constitutional history, these cases demonstrate that enforcement of these health laws became more difficult during the Progressive Era. Parties resisting these laws made broader constitutional challenges to the laws more often. While the number of victories for these parties remained steady, the scope of their victories became broader. The study also throws light on the early use of "regulatory crimes."

Governments were more likely throughout the study period to use a criminal rather than a civil enforcement process. Surprisingly, the use of criminal enforcement did not affect the government's success rate in these cases.

Introduction

Milk today seems so benign. But at the turn of the 20th century, safe milk was one of the preeminent public health challenges of the day. As people in the United States moved from the countryside into cities, their milk supply became unhealthy. Milk from cows in the country was transported further and stored at higher temperatures than in the past. Milk produced closer to the cities came from cows kept under crowded and unsanitary conditions. Many city residents, especially children, were getting sick and dying because of contaminated milk.

These threats to a food with special importance for children-praised as nature's "most nearly perfect" food (Crumbine & Tobey 1930:17; Wain 1970:250)-spurred governments at all levels into action. Health regulators were confident they could solve the milk problem. Beginning in the northeastern United States in the 1860s, and spreading throughout the nation by the 1900s, governments passed ordinances and statutes to safeguard the health of the milk supply. They pursued and punishedsometimes as criminals-those wrongdoers who distributed unsanitary milk.

As a result of the rising tide of governmental activity between 1860 and 1940, milk health regulation figures in two of the most familiar stories in the canon of legal history. The first of these stories deals with constitutional history. The treatment of milk safety laws in the courts was a key example of attempts, often unsuccessful, to enforce Progressive Era health legislation. The account familiar to students of constitutional history emphasizes the judges' hostility to health and safety regulation during the Progressive Era. Judges overturned many statutes and rules on constitutional grounds and were slow to accept the legitimacy of many laws defended as health regulations.1 This judicial hostility to popular health and safety laws created an institutional crisis.

By the end of the New Deal period, the backlash from this judicial effort to resist legislation led many judges to change course.

They began to defer to legislative decisions about health and economic matters (the so-called "switch in time that saved nine") (Fried 1998; Murphy 1972:41-167; Tribe 2000:1357-71).

Over the years, the truth of this oft-repeated story has come into question. Revisionists have pointed out that many health and safety statutes did survive constitutional challenges (Friedman 1985:355-58, 457-63; Semonche 1978; Urofsky 1985). Constitutional defeats for these laws did become more common during the Progressive Era, but the number of losses always remained low. Revisionists say that the occasional setbacks should not obscure an overall picture of judicial acceptance of health and safety statutes.2

These constitutional debates, however, have proceeded on the basis of surprisingly sketchy information about actual enforcement patterns.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Counting Cases about Milk, Our "Most Nearly Perfect" Food, 1860-1940
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.