Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

DME Dealers Dread Prospect of Competitive Bidding

By Levy, Sandra | Drug Topics, November 4, 2002 | Go to article overview

DME Dealers Dread Prospect of Competitive Bidding


Levy, Sandra, Drug Topics


HOME CARE

Suppliers of durable medical equipment (DME) should be aware that Medicare is getting closer to implementing a national competitive bidding program. Under competitive bidding, the program will award contracts for particular items or services to providers who submit lower bids.

In addition to a House bill (H.R. 4954) passed in June, proposals for national competitive bidding are included in two recently introduced Senate bills. The first bill (S. 3018) was introduced in September, and the second bill (S. 3098), also known as the Graham-Gramm bill, was introduced last month.

There are many differences among the bills. For one, under the Graham-- Gramm bill, competitive bidding would cover the following items: DME, off-the-shelf orthotics, surgical dressings, splints, casts, other devices in section 1861(s)(5), and infusion therapy. The previous Senate version of the legislation put these items under a mandatory demonstration project.

Another difference is that the first Senate bill requires competitive bidding to take place in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) with populations over 500,000 that will have "probable savings." The House bill gives the Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary authority to exempt areas that may have small populations and exclude items and services not likely to result in "significant savings."

Under the Graham-Gramm bill, the competitive acquisition area should be an MSA or within an MSA. However, population size is not specified. Therefore, more areas would be eligible under this version.

While both bills call for an annual report that would cover savings and access under the competitive bidding program, the House bill calls for a study of beneficiary satisfaction, and the Senate bill calls for the evaluation of the diversity of product selection available to the beneficiaries.

The Coalition for Access to Medical Services, Equipment, and Technology (CAMSET) was formed in June to oppose competitive bidding. The coalition is concerned that the expansion of competitive bidding from two ongoing demonstration projects to a national policy threatens to undermine quality of care, restricts patients' choice of service providers, stifle the development of new technology, and drive suppliers out of operation.

The American Association for Homecare's president and CEO, Tom Connaughton, who chairs CAMSET, told Drug Topics, "There are about 1,900 DME codes that may be involved in competitive bidding, so that's a lot of products. If I were the drugstores, I'd be upset about things like blood glucose strips.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

DME Dealers Dread Prospect of Competitive Bidding
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.