Mrs. Mcintyre's Persona: Bringing Privacy Theory to Election Law
McGeveran, William, The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Introduction
In 1995, the Supreme Court reversed the imposition of a one hundred dollar fine for violating disclosure requirements in Ohio election law.1 The case involved the late Mrs. Margaret Mclntyre, who had distributed homemade leaflets arguing against a proposed local school tax levy, some of which were signed only by "CONCERNED PARENTS AND TAX PAYERS."2 The rationale for the Court's decision was a robust understanding of privacy rights for political speech and association: "The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one's privacy as ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Mrs. Mcintyre's Persona: Bringing Privacy Theory to Election Law.
Contributors: McGeveran, William - Author.
Journal title: The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal.
Volume: 19.
Issue: 4
Publication date: May 2011.
Page number: 859+.
© Not available.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset