Qualitative and Quantitative Measures of Second Language Writing: Potential Outcomes of Informal Target Language Learning Abroad

By Brown, N. Anthony; Solovieva, Raissa V. et al. | Foreign Language Annals, Spring 2011 | Go to article overview

Qualitative and Quantitative Measures of Second Language Writing: Potential Outcomes of Informal Target Language Learning Abroad


Brown, N. Anthony, Solovieva, Raissa V., Eggett, Dennis L., Foreign Language Annals


Abstract: This research describes a method applied at a U.S. university in a thirdyear Russian language course designed to facilitate Advanced and Superior second language writing proficiency through the forum of argumentation and debate. Participants had extensive informal language experience living in a Russian-speaking country but comparatively little formal language instruction, especially with regard to writing. The authors quantitatively analyzed weekly position papers and ACTFL pre- and post- Written Proficiency Test compositions using prescribed complexity measures and compared them with qualitative ACTFL proficiency ratings. Preliminary findings underscore the value to both the writer and instructor of applying both quantitative and qualitative measures; they likewise point out challenges associated with teaching students whose language has become automatized, albeit oftentimes error-full, in part owing to the nature of past language study.

Key words: Russian, content-based instruction, curriculum development, second language acquisition, teaching methods, writing proficiency

Introduction

Matters of oral proficiency have received considerable attention in second language acquisition research, including the effects of study abroad on facilitating and even expediting language uptake. Less examined in the literature, nevertheless noteworthy of attention, is the area of second language (L2) writing, particularly in regard to assessment measures. While oral skills typically exceed other language skills at the ACTFL Novice and Intermediate levels, writing skills become increasingly important as one progresses to the Advanced level and beyond, in part owing to domain-specific expectations associated with such levels. Yet for many, written production never goes beyond the ''speech-written-down style of writing,'' which entails a degree of ''differentiation,'' i.e., a style of language unique from oral production in its syntactic complexity and increased usage of subordinated and embedded clauses (Weissberg, 2006, p. 10). If viewed from the perspective of the ACTFL Written Proficiency Test (WPT) Rating Grid by Sub-Level, then such a process of differentiation becomes particularly evident at the Intermediate-High/Advanced-Low threshold where writers are expected to demonstrate with increasing accuracy and consistency the ability to connect sentences into paragraphs using cohesive elements and devices. Sentence cohesion and paragraph-level discourse become increasingly sophisticated and consistent as one progresses stepwise within the Advanced level, thus contributing to a complexity that distinguishes itself from oral communication (see ACTFL, 2001).

One method used for assessing writing proficiency involves counting the total number of connectors per total number of words in a composition. Such measures provide fine-grained, quantitative analyses that, when coupled with qualitative descriptors associated with the holistic ACTFL rating scale, stand to enhance overall rater objectivity.

In essence, the WPT can serve as a valuable set of bookends at the beginning and end of a course; however, the gradual and often subtle language gain that transpires in-between those assessments likewise calls for an instrument capable of detecting nuanced degrees of change that help explain general movement in proficiency, e.g., participants' use of transition words, connectors, coordinate, participial, and adverbial clauses.

This article describes one method of facilitating foreign language uptake in writing applied at a U.S. university in a third-year Russian language course comprising students with extensive informal language experience in countries of the former Soviet Union but with comparatively little exposure to the formal elements of the language, in particular its writing system. The course was designed to push students' written proficiency from the Intermediate and Advanced levels to the Advanced and Superior levels, respectively. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Qualitative and Quantitative Measures of Second Language Writing: Potential Outcomes of Informal Target Language Learning Abroad
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.