Spoken vs. Sign Languages - What's the Difference?

By Damian, Simona | Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, June 2011 | Go to article overview

Spoken vs. Sign Languages - What's the Difference?


Damian, Simona, Cognitie, Creier, Comportament


ABSTRACT

Sign languages have become an increasingly discussed scientific topic given the rising awareness as to the Deaf Community, their language and their culture. Access to information and services is a matter of human rights and therefore sign language recognition and the development of sign language interpreting as a profession have become a matter of interest and research for many countries. This article seeks to emphasize some aspects that differentiate sign languages from spoken languages from several points of view: language structure, language use, language acquisition and interpreting. The aim is to offer some insight into this fairly new domain, based on a comparative approach. In the attempt to demystify sign language and sign language interpreting we offer clear examples that we hope will be useful for those interested in this challenging domain.

KEYWORDS: sign language structure, language acquisition, sign language interpreting, simultaneous, consecutive

In recent years increased attention has been given to the study of sign languages and numerous scientific researchers (beginning with Stokoe, 1960) have proven wrong the long-held belief that sign languages are inferior ways of communication. Sign languages have also been recognized by many states as the respective native language of the Deaf communities in those particular countries. According to a survey conducted by the WFD (World Federation of the Deaf) Deaf People and Human Rights (2009), "out of 93 countries, most of which are developing countries, only 44 countries have formal recognition of the country's sign language(s)". (2010, p. 2) The same document states however that among those which officially recognized sign language, only few countries actually offer equal chances to deaf people from a linguistic point of view.

Given the measures adopted in many parts of the world to maximize the potential of these languages, they are now increasingly used and learned by teachers working with the Deaf, social workers, language students and interpreting students. We therefore consider it important to underline some differences between spoken and sign languages in order to identify the specific elements, potentially difficult, that one must deal with when learning a sign language.

Nevertheless, "sign languages are conventional communication systems that arise spontaneously in all deaf communities. [...] They effectively fulfill the same social and mental functions as spoken languages" (Sandler & Lillo-Martin, 2009). We are not trying to emphasize the differences between spoken and sign languages in the detriment of the similarities between them. Sandler and Lillo- Martin (2006) have extensively studied linguistics universals starting from Noam Chomsky's principles and showed that there are more similarities than differences between these two groups of languages.

Just like spoken languages, sign languages are merged with the culture of the Deaf communities. We consider that language and culture are inseparable, influencing one another. Although we will not discuss here the differences between the Deaf and the hearing culture, they represent a fundamental element in understanding the language, its use and the implications for communication and interpreting.

In this article we will look into some aspects that differentiate sign languages from spoken languages from several points of view: language structure, language use, language acquisition and interpreting. The herein approach is based on the experience we have gained as an interpreter working from spoken languages and from and into Romanian Sign Language. The starting point of this undertaking was represented by the difficulties we had when starting to learn Romanian Sign Language and our aim is to pinpoint these aspects for the further development of the domain in Romania.

Although several countries have researched intensively on their respective sign languages, developing the related domains and offering in-depth linguistic and socio-cultural data, Romania is still making its first steps in this direction and unfortunately it lacks thorough scientific research (for now). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Spoken vs. Sign Languages - What's the Difference?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.