A Proposed Model Standard for Forensic Assessment of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

By Brown, Natalie Novick; Wartnik, Anthony P. et al. | Journal of Psychiatry & Law, Winter 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Proposed Model Standard for Forensic Assessment of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Brown, Natalie Novick, Wartnik, Anthony P., Connor, Paul D., Adler, Richard S., Journal of Psychiatry & Law

A model protocol is proposed for multidisciplinary assessment of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) in the forensic context. Used effectively on both sides of the courtroom in the United States in criminal and post-conviction matters in state and federal courts, the model relies on the FASD literature and best-practice standards of care in terms of clinical as well as forensic evaluation. It is suggested that FASD diagnostic criteria for older adolescents and adults in the criminal system may need different emphasis if facial features have diminished with age and confirmation of prenatal exposure is impossible.

KEY WORDS: FASD, multidisiplinary assessment.

It has been known for many years that persons with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) are at high risk of criminal behavior. According to criminal offender statistics maintained by the Department of Justice (Criminal Records Nationwide Criminal Search, 2008), the lifetime risk of going to state or federal prison in the United States is 3.4% (18.6% for blacks and 10% for Hispanics). While comparable statistics have never been compiled for individuals with FASD, a large government-sponsored study at the University of Washington in the mid-1990s found that approximately 60% of children, adolescents, and adults in this population had histories involving arrest, conviction and/or incarceration (Streissguth, Barr, Kogan, & Bookstein, 1996). Approximately 45% of these crimes involved crimes against persons, including assaults (17%) and domestic violence (15%). Since that historic study, only one comparative analysis has ever examined the prevalence of FASD within a discrete criminal justice population. In that analysis, all 287 youth remanded during a one-year period to a psychiatric facility in British Columbia were evaluated, and researchers (Fast, Conry, & Loock, 1999) found that 23.3% had FASD. Only 1% of those with FASD received a diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), and the rest were diagnosed with Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ARND). Both conditions are included under the FASD umbrella and involve brain damage and associated neurocognitive dysfunction due to prenatal alcohol exposure.

Combined, the implications of the British Columbia study and the earlier University of Washington study are alarming. If, according to the Department of Justice, over 2 million adults are now incarcerated in U.S. prisons and jails (Leary, 2009), plus approximately 100,000 youth held in juvenile facilities (Sickmund, 2010), what is the significance of these rates with respect to juvenile and adult offenders who may be brain damaged due to FASD? Most importantly, what do these figures mean with respect to the 3261 men and women now on death row in the United States (Fins, 2010)? Acknowledging the extensive Central Nervous System (CNS) damage in this population that produces a constellation of neurocognitive deficits in memory, attention, language, motor skills, social skills, academic achievement, cognition, and "executive control" difficulties in planning, organizing, learning from past mistakes, linking cause and effect, anticipating consequences, and taking the perspective of others, Moore and Green (2004) note:

This constellation of deficits poses significant obstacles to the fair treatment of FASD persons in the criminal justice system. Persons with FASD, as a group, challenge the underlying premise that defendants understand the relationship between actions, outcomes, intentions, and punishment. The treatment of FASD defendants raises fundamental questions about how we assess individual responsibility, both at the guilt-determining and sentencing stages of the adjudicative process, (p. 3)

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Center for Excellence (SAMHSA; 2007, para. 6) agrees that FASD merits special legal consideration: "Individuals with FASD typically are impulsive and have trouble foreseeing the consequences of their actions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Proposed Model Standard for Forensic Assessment of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?