Another "View" of Fingerprint Evidence

By Cherry, Michael; Imwinkelried, Edward J. et al. | Judicature, May/June 2011 | Go to article overview

Another "View" of Fingerprint Evidence


Cherry, Michael, Imwinkelried, Edward J., Schenk, Manfred, Judicature


Clearer exhibits better enable judges and jurors to evaluate the comparability of latent and known fingerprints.

In the vast majority of cases in which the prosecution presents fingerprint testimony, the jury convicts. That result is not surprising. Most members of the general public firmly believe fingerprint examiners' claim that they can accurately match crime scene impressions with the known fingerprints of defendants. Most prosecutors share that belief, and fhey consequendy frequently offer examiners' testimony about fingerprint analysis. Similarly, the clear majority of judges subscribe to the belief; and given that belief, in the typical case they admit fingerprint testimony over a defense objection. And since juries draw their ranks from the members of the general public, jurors tend to accept such testimony and confidentiy rely on it as a basis for convictions. This widespread belief helps explain why die defense probably loses over 90 percent of the trials at which the prosecution presents an examiner's testimony to a fingerprint match.

Yet, for well over a decade there have been concerted defense attacks on the reliability of fingerprint examination testimony.1 In 2009, the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences released its report entitled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: The Path Forward. The report added fuel to the defense attacks. The report states that in the popular AGE-V (Analysis Comparison Evaluation Verification) method of analysis, "examiners must make subjective assessments throughout."2 Furthermore, the report took sharp issue with the assertion of some examiners that fingerprint analysis has "a zero error rate."8

The recent experience of some image analysts appears to confirm the National Research Council's conclusion that the accuracy of fingerprint analysis has been overstated. These analysts have developed a number of techniques for assessing the accuracy of fingerprint analysis. One such technique involves the use of a simple computer methodology. More specifically, they attempted to improve the displays by placing a clear image of the crime scene latent on top of the image of the known fingerprint. This method differs from the old fashioned sideby-side display. This new method better enables the judge and jury to visualize the comparison and to see for themselves whether the prosecution expert is correct in opining that there is a match.

In several cases, working together with defense counsel, these experts have critically evaluated examiners' opinions that a crime scene image matched the image of a known fingerprint of a particular defendant. To be sure, these cases represent a small sample. However, in most of them, even though the examiner had declared a match, the image experts' exhibits strongly suggested that at most the examiner ought to have testified that the result of the comparison was inconclusive. In one Case, although again the expert had testified to a match, the exhibit seemingly dictated the conclusion that there were so many evident points of dissimilarity that there was no match. In all but one of these cases, after the image experts shared their exhibits with the government, the government decided against proceeding to trial. Charges Were dismissed, or the prosecution offered the defendant a much more favorable plea bargain after viewing the new exhibits.

The exhibits shown here were prepared in some Of these cases.4 In case 1, the use of the exhibits contributed to a hung jury; hi the other cases after the presentation of the exhibits to the government the prosecutor offered a more attractive plea bargain. The first three exhibits relate to case 1. The exhibits are: the prosecution exhibit, a conventional defense side-by-side exhibit, and the new on-top exhibit prepared by the imaging experts.

Global attacks

In the past, many defense counsel have made "global" attacks on the validity of fingerprint analysis. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Another "View" of Fingerprint Evidence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.