The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009-Imputed Governmental Tort Liability Immunity

By Masino, Anthony; McCurry, Elizabeth | Southern Business Review, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009-Imputed Governmental Tort Liability Immunity


Masino, Anthony, McCurry, Elizabeth, Southern Business Review


The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (hereinafter "the Recovery Act") has its proponents and detractors. At a time when the United States was facing its worst recession in more than fifty years, the 1 1 1th session of the United States Congress ("Congress") passed the Recovery Act to stimulate and stabilize the United States economy. The intention of the Recovery Act was to create jobs, promote additional capital investment, increase consumer spending, and minimize or avoid reductions in state and local government services. In total, more than $700 billion was allocated to the Recovery Act via federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and domestic spending for education, health care, and infrastructure. More than a third of the money was slated for projects and activities, including construction and certain research projects. To implement a project using the allocated federal funds, agencies and funding recipients must comply with federal laws and regulations.1 This article will address whether governmental immunity to tort liability has been imputed to infrastructure projects funded via the Recovery Act. This article will summarize the Recovery Act and the background and history of governmental tort immunity while addressing the possibility that immunity at the federal and state levels has been imputed to government contractors based upon the Recovery Act While this article highlights the potential implications, final determination is beyond its scope and may not be fully resolved until federal and/ or state courts address the matter directly.

The Recovery Act

The Recovery Act received bipartisan support during the transition from one administration to the next. The newly elected President stated the Recovery Act

will create or save 3.5 million jobs over the next two years. It's that we're putting Americans to work doing the work that America needs done, in critical areas that have been neglected for too long; work that will bring real and lasting change for generations to come. Because we know we can't build our economic future on the transportation and information networks of the past, we are remaking the American landscape with the largest new investment in our nation's infrastructure since Eisenhower built an Interstate Highway System in the 1950s. Because of this investment, nearly 400,000 men and women will go to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, repairing our faulty dams and levees, bringing critical broadband connections to businesses and homes in nearly every community in America, upgrading mass transit, building high-speed rail lines that will improve travel and commerce throughout our nation.2

The Recovery Act was a direct response to the economic crisis, with three immediate goals:

* Create new jobs and save existing ones;

* Spur economic activity and invest in long-term growth; and

* Foster unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency in government spending.

The Recovery Act intends to achieve those goals by

* Providing $288 billion in tax cuts and benefits for millions of working families and businesses;

* Increasing federal funds for education and health care as well as entitlement programs (such as extending unemployment benefits) by $224 billion;

* Making $275 billion available for federal contracts (over $100 billion for infrastructure projects), grants and loans; and

* Requiring recipients of Recovery funds to report quarterly on how they are using the money.

More than $100 billion is targeted for infrastructure development and enhancement. Of the $100 billion, more than $48 billion is slated for transportation infrastructure improvements including more than $27 billion for highway and bridge construction, $8 billion for intercity passenger rail projects, $2 billion for commercial rail infrastructure, $750 million for public transportation system maintenance, $200 million for upgrades to air traffic control centers, facilities and equipment as well as $100 million for shipyard improvements. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009-Imputed Governmental Tort Liability Immunity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.