The Financial Meltdown of 2008 and the Government's Intervention: Much Needed Relief or Major Erosion of American Corporate Law? the Continuing Story of Bank of America, Citigroup, and General Motors*

By Kerr, Janet E. | St. John's Law Review, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

The Financial Meltdown of 2008 and the Government's Intervention: Much Needed Relief or Major Erosion of American Corporate Law? the Continuing Story of Bank of America, Citigroup, and General Motors*


Kerr, Janet E., St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

The year 2008 found the American public following two dramatically different news stories: the divisive, yet exciting, presidential campaign and that of the struggling American economy. Housing prices were plummeting, leading to a meltdown in the sub-prime mortgage lending arena, Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, and the government found itself watching several other American institutions on the verge of collapsing. Instead of allowing the economy to recover on its own, the government stepped in and attempted to revive many corporations, and in turn, the economy, on a much grander scale than what the American people generally expect of their government.1 One way in which the government began this attempted revival was through the passage of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on October 3, 2008.2 The Act was created to help stabilize the American financial system and prevent further damage-a goal it sought to accomplish through the creation of the Troubled Asset Relief Program ("TARP"), among other measures.3 Through TARP, the government ultimately lent up to $700 billion to many financial institutions in the hopes of saving them from collapse.4 The government gave billions more to other corporations in the form of mortgage-backed security purchases, direct investments, loan guarantees, and loans, totaling over $1.33 trillion.5 The government then became a creditor of many major corporations, as well as a majority or controlling shareholder in some situations.6 A year after the crisis started and on the anniversary of Lehman Brothers' collapse, President Barack Obama addressed Wall Street bankers, advising them to "embrace serious financial reform, not fight it."7

In the case of Bank of America, the government simply loaned money, first through TARP to help it survive, and later lent more to help it buy another failing financial institution, Merrill Lynch.8 In September 2008, Bank of America agreed to purchase Merrill Lynch, and the shareholders approved the transaction on December 5, 2008.9 In agreeing to the transaction and in persuading shareholders to approve it, Bank of America's board of directors relied on representations made in September 2008 as to Merrill Lynch's financial condition.10 However, in mid-December 2008, Bank of America's board of directors learned that Merrill Lynch's financial condition was not as it was represented to them in September 2008.11 In fact, it was significantly worse.12 Nevertheless, Bank of America went forward with the transaction, allegedly under pressure from government officials to complete the transaction and not disclose the information concerning Merrill Lynch's financial condition to shareholders.13 Alleging that such omissions were material, the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed suit against Bank of America and began investigating why Bank of America did not disclose Merrill Lynch's deteriorating financial condition sooner.14 While Judge Jed Rakoff dismissed the first settlement proposed by the parties because it unfairly punished the shareholders,15 he eventually-albeit reluctantly-approved a $150 million settlement in January 2010.16 Indeed, Judge Rakoff harshly criticized the settlement and chastised the bank for "hiding material information from its shareholders," claiming that the actions of Bank of America amounted to "fraud."17 Furthermore, although the SEC refused to file a suit against any individual executives, the settlement approval did not thwart a similar suit from New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who charged the bank and two top executives with civil securities fraud.18 While many conflicting accounts exist, this transaction between Bank of America and Merrill Lynch raises important legal questions regarding the government's interaction with and influence over the private sector. Saving a corporation or multiple corporations from failure is certainly commendable, especially when these efforts may significantly help the overall American economy.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Financial Meltdown of 2008 and the Government's Intervention: Much Needed Relief or Major Erosion of American Corporate Law? the Continuing Story of Bank of America, Citigroup, and General Motors*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.