Texas Arbitration Act Allows What Hall Street Doesn't: Broader Judicial Review

Dispute Resolution Journal, May-July 2011 | Go to article overview

Texas Arbitration Act Allows What Hall Street Doesn't: Broader Judicial Review


STATE COURT DEVELOPMENTS

The Texas Supreme Court has held that the Texas Arbi tra - tion Act (TAA) does not preclude the parties from agreeing in their contract to judicial review of an arbitration award for reversible error. It further held that the Federal Arbi - tration Act does not preempt enforcement of such an agreement.

The decision in Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn (No. 08-0613, 2011 WL 1820875, May 13, 2011) rejects the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel (552 U.S. 576, 2008), which concluded that the FAA precludes party expansion of the grounds for review under the FAA.

Nafta Traders is an employment case in which the employer terminated Margaret Quinn's employment as vice president of operations on the ground that worsening business conditions warranted a reduction in the workforce. Quinn sued alleging sex discrimination in violation of the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. The employer moved to compel arbitration under the FAA, citing the arbitration clause in the employee handbook. Although the handbook did not state the governing law, Quinn did not object to the FAA, so the court issued an agreed order to arbitrate. The arbitrator awarded Quinn back pay and other relief. When she moved to confirm the award under the TAA, the employer moved to vacate under both the FAA and the TAA. It also relied on a provision in the arbitration clause that denied the arbitrator authority "(i) to render a decision which contains a reversible error of state or federal law, or (ii) to apply a cause of action or remedy not expressly provided for under existing state or federal law." The employer argued that this provision showed that the parties agreed to more expansive judicial review than the TAA and FAA al lowed.

Just before the court ruled, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Hall Street, ruling that the grounds for review in the FAA are exclusive and parties cannot expanded them by contract. Thereafter, the Texas court issued a brief order confirming the award.

On the employer's appeal, the Texas Court of Appeals ruled that similarities between the TAA and the FAA weighed heavily in favor of construing them as the Supreme Court had in Hall Street. Accordingly, the appeals court held that parties are limited to judicial review based on the statutory grounds enumerated in the TAA. It also held that an arbitrator does not exceed his powers by deciding matters incorrectly.

Texas Supreme Court Reasoning

The Texas Supreme Court granted review and re versed. Saying it was not per suaded by the Supreme Court's reasoning in Hall Street, the court construed the TAA to permit parties to agree to allow the same kind of re - view as a judge would have, or to a corresponding limit on the arbitrator's authority. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Texas Arbitration Act Allows What Hall Street Doesn't: Broader Judicial Review
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.