Education Policy and School Segregation: A Study of the Denver Metropolitan Region

By Aske, David; Corman, Rhonda R. et al. | Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, July 1, 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Education Policy and School Segregation: A Study of the Denver Metropolitan Region


Aske, David, Corman, Rhonda R., Marston, Christine, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues


ABSTRACT

This study examines the extent of segregation in low performing elementary schools in the Denver metropolitan area from 1984-2007. The combination of state school choice policies and the accountability requirements of The No Child Left Behind Act, have contributed to this segregation. In Colorado, parents have choices regarding what school they want their children to attend. The schools' ratings often influence the choices parents make. The ratings are primarily a reflection of student scores on standardized tests. The racial segregation of students in addition to school funding, and teacher stability, are just some of the issues associated with school choice.

INTRODUCTION

It is a popular belief in today's America that there are equal opportunities for educational attainment. It is, at the very least, assumed that the fundamental structure of our public education system provides a level playing field for all children, regardless of gender, race, or religion. However, beginning in the 1950s, racial segregation of metropolitan areas became more common as increasing numbers of white families began moving from inner-city urban areas to suburban areas. For white families, the decision to relocate has been based on a combination of push and pull factors. The pull factors include the attractiveness and amenities of the suburbs (less congestion, more green space, etc..) and perception of higher quality schools. The push factors include inner-city crime, racism and declining property values.

Property taxes provide the primary funding source for public education, therefore impoverished, economically depressed regions find it almost impossible to adequately fund public education at the level necessary to guarantee educational quality equal to that in more economically affluent areas. By the same token, school districts in economically depressed areas find it difficult to compete for high quality teachers and support staff. These facts seem to be either accepted or perhaps just ignored by school funding policies which seem to perpetuate the status quo for Americans in poverty.

Federal policy over the past decade has taken steps to employ standardized testing on a national level to ensure that the quality of intra-national public education be comparable. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 mandates the assessment of students in public schools in reading and mathematics. NCLB also requires that states provide parents of students in poor performing schools the option of enrolling their children in a different school. These mandates are based on the widely supported idea that schools need to be held accountable to the public for educational quality. Standardized testing has become the primary means of accessing school success and providing for school accountability.

Colorado educational policy addressed the issue of standards based education almost a decade earlier. In 1993, the Colorado legislature passed HB 93 - 1313. This law required the state to develop content standards in twelve subject areas and a procedure for assessing student achievement. The student assessment tool is called the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP). The stated goals of CSAP are: 1) To determine the level at which Colorado students achieve the Colorado Model Content Standards, 2) To measure the progress of students over time, and 3) To add to the body of evidence to determine 3rd graders' literacy levels (Colorado Department of Education, Unit of Student Assessment).

Student performance on the tests are categorized as unsatisfactory, partially proficient, proficient, or advanced. The results of the tests are issued in state, district, school, and individual student reports. The reports provide data on the total and percentage of students who scored in each performance category as a whole and disaggregated based on various demographic variables such as gender and ethnicity. At the school level, CSAP scores are an important component of the School Accountability Report (SAR).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Education Policy and School Segregation: A Study of the Denver Metropolitan Region
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?