Sustaining FCS in Higher Education: A 2010 Perspective

By Firebaugh, Francille M.; Nickols, Sharon Y. et al. | Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Sustaining FCS in Higher Education: A 2010 Perspective

Firebaugh, Francille M., Nickols, Sharon Y., Atiles, Jorge H., Turkki, Kaija, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences

This article identifies characteristics of enduring FCS higher education programs and explores organizational changes and the impact of these changes. From multiple sources, characteristics of sustained programs were identified and categorized as (a) resource-based: strong leadership, outstanding faculty, adequate resources; (b) program-related: robust academic and engagement efforts; interdisciplinarity; student body quality, size, and diversity; and (c) strategic vision-oriented: commitment to a culture of change and effective communications. Recent organizational changes in some higher education institutions have led to mergers with other units and dispersal of FCS faculty. Outcomes have included survival of some content areas, weakened ties to FCS, and new directions and collaborations. Other FCS units have sustained a strong identity and continuity.

Many family and consumer sciences (FCS) programs have endured over time, surviving by their quality, capacity to withstand adverse conditions, and openness to change. They vary widely in emphasis, configuration, content, and name. As with many other disciplines, continuation of comprehensive FCS units per se is an increasingly significant concern as higher education responds to many challenges. These challenges include severe budgetary strains, shifting demographics, global competition for talent, rapid changes and increased sophistication in the sciences, goals to increase academic excellence, and other pressing issues.

The purposes of this article are to identify characteristics of enduring FCS higher education programs and to explore organizational changes and the impact they have had. Five case studies, germane articles dealing with sustainability in higher education, and our observations and experiences in higher education form the basis for the article.

Decades ago, Firebaugh (1980) and Bailey, Firebaugh, Haley, and Nickols (1993) considered issues and paradigms affecting the future of FCS, focusing on program survival. Stokes (2009) observed that higher education program planners must alter the perspective "from survival to sustainability." Turkki and Vincenti (2008) concluded that home economics has a sustainable mission and its history can be a resource for the future.

The mission of FCS programs in higher education is to improve the human condition and educate citizenry for the future. McGregor and Gentzler (2009) defined the primary purpose of home economics "to socialise new generations of practitioners to improve the quality of life and augment the human condition" (p. 15). Sustainable FCS programs in comprehensive universities focus on student learning, research, and public engagement about social, health, economic, and environmental issues.

FCS programs of varying size, academic offerings, organizational structure, private or public governance, and geographic location comprise the case studies. Two programs are located in Midwestern land-grant universities-one a separate college and the other a college resulting from the merger of two colleges. Southern programs included are a college in a land-grant university and a school in a denominational college. The fifth is a college in a Southwestern state university. The case studies are based on a set of questions exploring leadership patterns, changes in the unit in the past 10 years, challenges to maintaining a sustainable academic program, threats to the unit, external support for research, enrollment data, and physical facilities.


Higher education institutions will inevitably change in response to our rapidly changing world. Characteristics that promote long-standing FCS programs are probably necessary, but they may be insufficient for continuing a given academic program in its current structure and organization. The characteristics of sustainability are classed as resource-based, program-related, and strategic vision-oriented.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Sustaining FCS in Higher Education: A 2010 Perspective


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?