Determinants of Consumer Attitudes toward Brand Extensions: An Experimental Study

By Iyer, Shobha G.; Banerjee, Bibek et al. | International Journal of Management, September 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Determinants of Consumer Attitudes toward Brand Extensions: An Experimental Study


Iyer, Shobha G., Banerjee, Bibek, Garber, Lawrence L., International Journal of Management


Brand extension is a form of new product introduction in which the name of an established brand is attached to a new product introduced in a separate category, facilitating acceptance because consumers transfer the affect and meanings they associate with the parent brand to the extension. A factorial investigation varies three factors, attitude toward the parent brand, brand specific associations formed in the extension category, and similarity of fit between parent and extension categories. Results of a convenience sample of 360 consumers surveyed in India indicates that attitude toward the parent brand is the strongest factor influencing extension evaluation, substantiating the efficacy of extension. Brand specific associations in the extension category may enhance the transfer process, though consumers seem not to engage in similarity matching of parent and extension categories in making this transfer. Transfer is dampened if the parent brand is prototypical of its category. Managerial implications are discussed.

Introduction

Though there have been many successful launches of new products as brand extensions in the last 30 years, there have also been many failures (Reddy, Holak and Bhat 1994; Taylor 2004; Trout and Ries 1981), a record that should call into question the efficacy of brand extension far more than it has. Likely contributing to a popular belief in the efficacy of brand extension is its compelling conceptual basis. Built on the notion that established brands hold equity as intangible assets of a firm (Rao, Agarwal, and Dahlhoff 2004), it follows that there would be leverage in the transfer of established brand names as a means of reducing risk of introduction and accelerating comprehension and trial (Aaker and Keller 1 990). Accordingly, brand extension efficacy may appear self-evident, and its wide acceptance could thus be due to mere bandwagon effect.

Two relatively recent studies do offer empirical support for the efficacy of brand extension. Yeung and Wyer (2005) suggest that parent brand affect positively influences extension brand affect. Reddy, Holak and Bhat (1994) demonstrate that parent brand strength and symbolic value contribute positively to line extension brand market share. However, neither study tests brand extension in the context of alternative factors that others have proposed could explain extension success, those being similarity of fit (Aaker and Keller 1990), parent brand prototypicality (Farquar and Herr 1992) and the relevance of brand specific associations in the extension category (Broniarczyk and Alba 1994). Also included in our model is a factor hypothesized to mediate the effect of parent brand attitude, that being parent brand prototypicality.

We test a model of extension efficacy whose scope, design, method, and means of analysis take it past the limitations of prior studies. Specifically, we: (1) review the literature on brand extension; (2) present a theoretical framework which identifies the main factors that determine attitude toward a brand extension, including those factors that represent alternative explanations for brand extension, and limiting factors to brand extension; (3) provide a methodology that allows the researcher to decompose and estimate the relative effects of each of these factors within and across brands, as well as the special case of distant extensions; (4) provide an empirical test of the framework's predictions; (5) extend these findings to India; and, (6) discuss managerial implications.

Parent brand attitude and brand specific associations relevant to the extension category

Alternative explanations for brand extension success have been put forward. Van Osselaer and Alba (2003) argue that parent brand attribute beliefs (ie., brand meaning) are not transferable and stay with the parent brand, while Broniarczyk and Alba (1994) argue that brand-specific associations relevant to the extension category have a direct effect on new product entry, independently of any transfer process.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Determinants of Consumer Attitudes toward Brand Extensions: An Experimental Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?