"Illinois Is Rotten with Traitors!" the Republican Defeat in the 1862 State Election

By Allardice, Bruce S. | Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, Spring 2011 | Go to article overview

"Illinois Is Rotten with Traitors!" the Republican Defeat in the 1862 State Election


Allardice, Bruce S., Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society


As the 1860 election returns slowly trickled into party headquarters, Chicago's Republicans began to celebrate. Their candidate for president, fellow fllinoisan Abraham Lincoln swept the North and the Electoral College in a landslide. Even Illinois, heretofore staunchly Democratic, succumbed to the appeal of the man the newspapers dubbed the "rail splitter," with Republicans claiming the governorship and the state legislature. In the streets outside the Chicago Tribune offices, crowds of men and women "were abroad in the streets, and eagerly asking and exchanging the latest," unwilling to go home "if there was any good news yet to be received." The next day "the streets were thronged" with "Republicans, eager to hear the confirmation and swelling of the previous days' triumph." The vast Republican rally that evening featured speeches, bonfires, "rockets and Roman candles," and a two-hundred-gun grand salute. More prosaic Republicans pocketed thousands of dollars their downcast Democratic friends wagered on the election results.1 Yet only two years later, and in the midst of a war, Illinois reversed itself and voted Democratic. This article will examine how and why Illinois' Republican majority of 1860 and the proUnion consensus of 1861 disappeared by the November 1862 elections. The article will also examine whether the Republican defeat in 1862 was caused by the Emancipation Proclamation (as many scholars assert), or by Republican voters unable to vote because they had volunteered for the army (as some contemporaries believed).

When the Civil War erupted in April of 1861, the nation's leading Democrat, Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, promptly called upon his fellow-IUinoisan and long-time political foe, President Abraham Lincoln, to pledge his support. Lincoln appreciated both the pledge and the potential support from Douglas's many followers in the North. A few days later, Douglas returned home to Illinois to rally Democrats to support the war to save the Union. "There are only two sides to the question," he proclaimed. "There can be no neutrals in this war, only patriots or traitors." All Americans, but especially Democrats, should support the war, even if they longed for peace, because"the shortest way to peace is the most stupendous and unanimous preparation for war."2

In 1861 the citizens of Illinois, heeding Douglas's patriotic appeal, enthusiastically sustained the Union cause. Democrats vied with Republicans in endorsing President Lincoln's decision to use force to preserve the Union. Almost everyone (except the professional soldiers) thought the war would be short, sweet, and successful. The Chicago Tribune, the leading Republican Party newspaper in Chicago, predicted that the Union victory would take "two or three months at the furthest." Illinois alone, the Tribune boasted, "can whip the South by herself."3

However, that initial burst of boastful newspaper optimism and bipartisan enthusiasm soon subsided. The war did not end in three months or six months. Casualties mounted. Taxes rose. And as the Lincoln administration undertook war measures that interfered with traditional civil liberties, political divisions re-emerged.

The commitment of Douglas and of those Democrats who looked to Douglas as their leader to the war effort, while sincere, did not mean that the normal operations of party politics would somehow disappear. Democrats had every right to think of themselves as the natural governing party of the nation and of Illinois. Until 1860 Illinois had always voted for the Democratic Party's presidential candidate. As late as 1858, the Democrats had controlled the state legislature and re-elected Douglas to the U.S. Senate. Many Illinois Democrats looked upon the new, upstart Republican Party, born as a third-party coalition of disparate elements, as a flash-in-the-pan, which, like the Know-Nothing movement of a few years earlier, would founder on its own internal contradictions, with the Democratic Party retaking control of the state.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"Illinois Is Rotten with Traitors!" the Republican Defeat in the 1862 State Election
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.