Cost Ramifications of Municipal Consolidation: A Comparative Analysis

By Martin, Joseph; Scorsone, Eric A. | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cost Ramifications of Municipal Consolidation: A Comparative Analysis

Martin, Joseph, Scorsone, Eric A., Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ABSTRACT. In 2001, the first municipal consolidation occurred in over 100 years in Michigan between two cities and one village in Michigan's rural Upper Peninsula, forming the City of Iron River. The three units of government combined to have a population of 3,391 within the newly incorporated boundaries. Driving the consolidation was continual population loss and erosion of the economic tax base of the individual municipal governments since the 1960s. This study sought to assess whether, five years after the consolidation, the governments had saved money as compared to a peer group of governments in Michigan. The findings indicate that the new city of Iron River was able to provide some evidence of cost control and savings following the consolidation.


Local government consolidation has been a constant running theme in public administration and public finance for nearly a century. Over that period of time, claims and counterclaims regarding the cost and benefits of such consolidations have continued to occur. For example, state policies have generally sought to encourage school district consolidation in response to falling populations and declining economies. Although the pace of consolidation has declined since the early 1970s, data shows that the number of school districts in the United States fell from over 128,000 in 1932 to 13,506 in 2002 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2002). Considerable research effort has been spent examining the cost economies of school district consolidation. The studies have found potential savings on administrative and instructional costs when moving from a very small district, fewer than 500 pupils, to enrollment levels between 2,000 and 4,000 (Andrews, Duncombe, & Yinger, 2002).

In the general government arena, there have been investigations of larger municipal jurisdictions' consolidation efforts and the potential impact on costs such as that of Jacksonville, Florida. A 1984 analysis of the city county consolidation in Jacksonville looked at the time period between 1955 and 1981 whereas the merger took place in 1969. The findings from this study indicated that cost savings and taxes were not exhibited as a result of the merger. In a study of Unigov in Indianapolis, Bloomquist and Parks (1995) found that there was little evidence of cost savings or tax reductions from that city-county consolidation. The articles that do exist on the topic of measuring and assessing cost savings from municipal consolidation appear to indicate evidence that such savings do not exist; this in spite of the enormous conceptual and anecdotal discussion that such savings are critical (Benton & Gamble, 1984; Brunch & Strauss, 1992).


This paper seeks to extend empirical knowledge of the cost and implications of government consolidation. Given the infrequency of municipal consolidations in the United States, it has often been difficult to muster empirical evidence regarding this issue. In the upper peninsula of Michigan, a municipal consolidation occurred in 2000, the first one in over a century. This consolidation provides a test bed case study to assess the cost savings and arguments of the consolidation movement. The modern city of Iron River, Michigan, and the comparison units of this study are located in rural portions of Michigan's Upper Peninsula or northern half of the Lower Peninsula. Preconsolidation of the two cities and one village provided a unique opportunity to examine the potential cost savings from the consolidation of small units of municipal government (Table 1).

Michigan's Upper Peninsula is home to numerous small cities and villages that evolved from the iron and copper mining communities that flourished for over century in Michigan starting in the mid-1800s. Throughout this period, copper mining was prevalent in Keweenaw, Houghton, and Ontonagon counties. Copper mining in Michigan effectively ceased in 1969, although small operations continued until the last mine closed in 1997.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cost Ramifications of Municipal Consolidation: A Comparative Analysis


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?