Assessing European Union's Development Policy: Building the Bridge between Rhetoric and Deeds

By Karamalakov, Nikolay | Romanian Journal of European Affairs, December 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Assessing European Union's Development Policy: Building the Bridge between Rhetoric and Deeds

Karamalakov, Nikolay, Romanian Journal of European Affairs


This paper covers the topic of European Union (EU)'s development policy, focusing exclusively on the actions taken by the European institutions. It is argued here that despite the official rhetoric of the Union to support primarily least-developed states, development aid is distributed predominantly to states where the EU has geopolitical/colonial/trade interests, and major shares of aid are actually granted to advanced countries, rather than for poverty alleviation. This contribution analyses the strengths and weaknesses of this policy considering the current global challenges and which countries are entitled to bigger shares of development aid and why. The focus of this article is placed on the inconsistent guiding logic behind aid allocation in the EU. Furthermore, the thesis outlines a new 'pro-poor' approach that would align the implementation of the policy with the existing commitments. The main conclusion is that if the Union does not shift its actions towards poorer states as officially promised, it will undermine its aspirations for global actorness.

Keywords: European development policy, allocated sums, shifting aid priorities, 'pro-poor' approach


EU and its Member States (MS) are considered the major providers of development aid in the world, amounting up to 65% of the total volume of Official Development Assistance (ODA) on yearly basis, or nearly euro60 billion in 2010 (OECD, 2011; European Commission (EC), 2010). In general, these substantial financial resources focus on principles such as strengthening democracy and eradicating poverty, which are found throughout both the political and technical documentation of aid provision'. Forthe period 2007-2013 the Union has committed euro146.5 billion for development, humanitarian and cooperation aid (Gavas 2009) with the main efforts of the EU's policy extending to economic and trade relations, better political dialogue and common strategies for coping with the challenges of today - poverty and famine among the most important, thus trying to meet the 8 challenges of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG).

Behind the rhetoric of the fundamental EU documents CTFEU, the Consensus on Development), one encounters difficulties when analysing aid effectiveness due to vague objectives and undefined target indicators regarding the expected effect of the financed projects, as well as an unclear picture of the accountability of the committed financial resources. Despite the political message, that the allocated external aid targets people from the developing countries as end beneficiaries, and despite there is evident positive effect through national and local incentives, the EC is exercising a selective strategy. As a result this paper sets out to reveal that EU institutions, in stark contradiction with their own official objectives, are granting the bigger share of the ODA support to better developed countries, rather than to the least-developed ones. Therefore, this contribution will dwell upon the reasons why the EU is distributing aid in this manner, and it will furthermore give a possible solution to the core problem -the conflict between 'rhetoric' and 'actual deeds'.

The aim of this analysis will be achieved by presenting the guiding political rhetoric behind the distribution of official development assistance of the European Union institutions in respect of eradicating poverty in the least-developed countries in the 21 st century and by outlining the most troublesome aspects of the development policy which may hinder its overall effectiveness with the special focus being on the weak link between EU's political commitments and the logic of aid allocation in which developing countries are supported. On this basis we would then propose a new approach for disbursing financial aid that would increase the operational capacity of the development policy. As a result, the thesis will provide additional points to the debate that the EU development policy is in need of change now in order to strengthen the Union's global presence, and make it an example of how other donor organisations should follow their commitments and support the developing countries.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Assessing European Union's Development Policy: Building the Bridge between Rhetoric and Deeds


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?