Amnesia, Nostalgia, and the Politics of Place Memory

By Farrar, Margaret E. | Political Research Quarterly, December 2011 | Go to article overview

Amnesia, Nostalgia, and the Politics of Place Memory


Farrar, Margaret E., Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

This article examines two seemingly opposed modes of place-making, urban sprawl and historic preservation, and their relationship to memory. The author contends that urban sprawl creates a landscape of either willful or accidental amnesia, where the powers of place are neutralized by ignoring them or removing them from history. Historic preservation, however, can have equally depoliticizing effects by conjuring up peculiar, selective, or even wholly imaginary pasts. Despite their apparent opposition, both practices often work against a meaningful understanding of the relationship between identity, memory, and place. Rather than accept the false choice between amnesia and nostalgia, the author advocates for an ethos of what Walter Benjamin calls "porosity" in creating, maintaining, and evaluating the vitality of our urban spaces.

Keywords

memory, place, urban planning, nostalgia, amnesia, porosity

Without the enduring permanence of human artifact, there "cannot be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after."

-Hannah Arendt, quoting Ecclesiastes, The Human Condition

This article is written at the intersection of place, memory, and politics. My broad claim is that urban planning practices should be of interest to political theorists, and not only for the role they play in creating and sustaining economic and racial injustice (Bickford 2000; Farrar 2008; Hayward 2003), or for their ability to influence practices of citizenship (Kohn 2004; Kogl 2007; McBride 2005). Urban planning practices are certainly important to political theorists for these reasons, but they have an additional political dimension: specifically, they help to cultivate or diminish our understanding of the past and our place in it. How we choose to build history into or eradicate history from our cities and towns shapes our understandings of identity, community, and responsibility. In short, how we attend to the past through the medium of the built environment has political implications for our future.

Recognizing the political power inherent in the construction of landscapes makes it easy to be critical of the state of contemporary American urban planning. By any measure, the most pervasive form of planning is what its detractors call "urban sprawl." For anyone interested in fostering sustainability and vitality in American cities, sprawl is an anathema: a twenty-first-century topography of distinctly unmemorable landscapes characterized by endless, homogeneous stretches of drive-by scenery, drive-through eateries, and stunningly forgettable architecture. Yet many of the popular, academic, and practitioner responses to sprawl come uncomfortably close to what one might call landscapes of nostalgia; the rarefied remembrances celebrated by historic preservationists are one such example. As sprawl has proliferated over the past five decades, the reclamation of past spaces for preservation and beautification has proceeded apace. In direct contrast to placeless places, designated historic sites attempt to shore up memory, putting it at the front and center of public consciousness.

This article, then, is motivated by the question, What effects do these recent, and seemingly opposed, trends in place-making have on our relationship to the past, and on our capacity for politics? My answer is grounded in recent accounts of memory that emphasize its visceral and embodied qualities, as opposed to locating it solely within the realm of consciousness. At the same time, however, I take issue with this line of thought when it ignores or undervalues the role of place in the formation of political identity. Instead, I suggest here that individual and collective memory can be inherited, buttressed, or devalued through the medium of the built environment and that neither urban sprawl nor historic preservation provides the tools necessary to make space for democratic politics.

Memory and Place in Political Theory

I begin from the Nietzschean assertion that memory is embodied and that its physicality is political. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Amnesia, Nostalgia, and the Politics of Place Memory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.