Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Social Capital, Racial Diversity, and Equity: Evaluating the Determinants of Equity in the United States

By Hawes, Daniel P.; Rocha, Rene R. | Political Research Quarterly, December 2011 | Go to article overview

Social Capital, Racial Diversity, and Equity: Evaluating the Determinants of Equity in the United States


Hawes, Daniel P., Rocha, Rene R., Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

Robert Putnam's work suggests social capital is compatible with social equality, while Rodney Hero argues the two are inversely related. Hero and Putnam, however, are limited in their arguments because they have only cross-sectional data and their theoretical arguments imply dynamic relationships over time. We create a state-level social capital index and a measure of racial diversity that varies over time and across states. We use multivariate models to determine whether social capital or racial diversity better predicts levels of policy equity. We find that social capital detrimentally affects policy equity and racial diversity is positively associated with policy equity.

Keywords

social capital, diversity, policy equity, political culture, race and ethnicity

One of the more innovative and controversial concepts introduced to the study of politics and policy is the notion of social capital. Putnam's (2000) work documents a decline in social capital and relates social capital to a wide range of public policies at the level of the American states. Hero (2003a; 2003b, 2007) stresses racial diversity and challenges the benefits of social capital by focusing on questions of equity; he argues that social capital might provide overall benefits to citizens living in a high-socialcapital community but that these benefits will be maldistributed in racially diverse political systems. Although both arguments rely heavily on dynamic elements-that is, social capital and racial diversity change over time-both were restricted to empirical analyses on a cross-section of U.S. states, thus making it difficult to separate the concepts and limiting the types of possible analysis.

This article seeks to address the issues in the Putnam- Hero debate by building dynamic measures of both social capital and racial diversity. First, the literature on social capital and racial diversity will be reviewed. Second, using a wide range of data sets including original marketing surveys, we will construct and validate measures of social capital and racial diversity. Third, each will be used along with a variety of other factors known to influence policy to study racial equity in education, criminal justice, and health care, focusing on both African Americans and Latinos.

The Social Capital Thesis

In its simplest form, social capital can be said to refer to "connections among individuals" or, in other words, "social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them" (Putnam 2000, 19). One of Putnam's (2000) central arguments is that at the individual level, engagement within the community is associated with more tolerant attitudes, while social isolation tends to be joined with intolerance. Putnam's (2000, 469, n. 9) own review of the literature concludes that while not all studies have found a positive relationship between civic engagement and tolerance, not one has established a negative relationship. Verba, Schlozman, and Brady's (1995) influential study, for example, demonstrates that civic engagement (e.g., attendance at community meetings) is linked with increased political tolerance, although nonsocial forms of political participation (e.g., contacting a government official) are not. One exception to this trend is participation in religious organizations, which may be associated with lower levels of political tolerance (Beatty and Walter 1984).

One of Putnam's central theses is that social capital can have "externalities" that go beyond the individual and affect the larger community. Extending this argument to the state level, Putnam observes that residents of highsocial- capital states tend to express higher levels of support for racial integration, gender equality, and civil liberties than residents of low-social-capital states. As Putnam (2000, 356) states, "Far from being incompatible, liberty and fraternity are mutually supportive. . . . The most tolerant communities in America are precisely the places with the greatest civic involvement.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Social Capital, Racial Diversity, and Equity: Evaluating the Determinants of Equity in the United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.