Competition as a Discovery Procedure: A Rejoinder to Professor Kirzner on Coordination and Discovery

By Klein, Daniel B. | Journal of Private Enterprise, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Competition as a Discovery Procedure: A Rejoinder to Professor Kirzner on Coordination and Discovery


Klein, Daniel B., Journal of Private Enterprise


Abstract

The Fall 2010 issue of the Journal of Private Enteprise featured a complicated set of papers. The lead article was a long paper by Jason Briggeman and me on Israel Kirzner's work on coordination and discovery. The thrust of our paper was an affirmation of Kirzner's central claims, but with two alterations. First, we propose that the coordination that figures into the central issues ought to be understood as what we call concatenate coordination. Second, the central statements at issue ought not be asserted as holding 100 percent of the time, but rather should be by-and-large statements, making for a strong presumption, not a categorical result. Israel Kirzner then replied to our paper. The pair of papers was then the object of commentary by Peter Boettke and Daniel D'Amico, Steven Horwitz, Gene Callahan, and Martin Ricketts. Here, I respond to Kirzner. My replies to the commentators are, because of space constraints, not contained here, but may be found as an appendix in the longer version of this paper available online.

JEL Codes: A10, B00, C7, D2

Keywords: Coordination; Concatenation; Discovery; Entrepreneurship

I. Introduction

What the market process does is to systematically translate unnoticed opportunities for mutually profitable exchange among individuals into forms that tend to excite the interest and alertness of those most likely to notice what can be spontaneously learned. In this way the opportunities for social improvement via mutually profitable exchanges tend to be most rapidly discovered and exploited.

- Israel Kirzner (1979, p. 150)

The Spring 2010 issue of The Journal of Private Enterprise featured a symposium organized around a critique that Jason Briggeman and I wrote of Professor Kirzner's work on coordination and discovery. Professor Kirzner provided a lengthy reply to the critique. The two papers were the object of commentary by Peter Boettke and Daniel D'Amico (2010), Steven Horwitz (2010), Gene Callahan (2010), and Martin Ricketts (2010). The present piece is written as a response to Professor Kirzner (the "Professor" will be omitted henceforth with no disrespect). I offer responses to the other commentators, in light of the main-body response to Kirzner, in an appendix to the online version of this paper. Briggeman and I are grateful to all of those who have engaged our work, and to The Journal of Private Enterprise for hosting the exchange.

II. Intense Criticism of Deep Formulations Should Not Give Offense

Klein and Briggeman (2010) - henceforth, K-B, treated as a singular noun - critically examines not just one or two features of Kirzner's ideas, but sets of features, and in a way that pulls back the lens and interprets the set in terms of decisions at deep levels of formulation spanning five of Kirzner's books (1973, 1979, 1985, 1992, 2000) as well as numerous additional writings. The K-B critique traces out many dimensions and manifestations, resulting in what Kirzner calls a "barrage of criticisms." Readers of Kirzner's reply will notice that he felt some affront. I hope that any hard feelings can be put aside.

Where Briggeman and I felt that Kirzner became abstruse, we used the word "abstruse." Where we felt that particular invocations of Hayek on coordination were spurious, we used "spurious." Where we felt that Kirzner shifted between meanings, or made inconsistent statements, we used "shifted" and "inconsistent."

A great, visionary thinker such as Kirzner, a maker of master formulations, will run into trade-offs and limitations. In surveying the terrains verged upon when working at a deep level, he must creatively formulate alternatives and assess those alternatives for their relative merits. All great thinkers run up against becoming abstruse and shifting about. For example, Adam Smith's moral theory, particularly the enshrouding of all moral judgment in sympathy, was extensively criticized by Scotsmen of his and the next generations as unduly abstruse (see the criticisms in Reeder, 1997). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Competition as a Discovery Procedure: A Rejoinder to Professor Kirzner on Coordination and Discovery
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.