Style of Substance? Media Perceptions of Clinton's Economic and Timber Summits

By Roberts, Alasdair | Public Administration Quarterly, Summer 1997 | Go to article overview

Style of Substance? Media Perceptions of Clinton's Economic and Timber Summits


Roberts, Alasdair, Public Administration Quarterly


ABSTRACT

Many scholars have called for a redefining of the role of public officials to emphasize their obligation to foster public discourse on important policy questions. Clinton's economic and timber summits are presented as two attempts by an elected official to put this new approach to leadership into practice. This article concludes that officials who engage in activities of this kind will confront three difficulties: the media's skepticism about the integrity of deliberations that are organized and led by public officials; its doubt about the usefulness of public discourse as a means of overcoming differences of opinions; and its inability to find any metaphor to describe events such as the economic and timber summits that is congenial to the goal of fostering public discourse.

INTRODUCTION

A growing number of political scientists have expressed concern about the poverty of public discourse on current issues in the United States. Some have argued that the "crisis of legitimacy" (Mansbridge, 1980) confronting American government may be rooted in the declining quality of public deliberation on government policy. If citizens are unable to engage one another in conversation about current issues, these commentators argue, they will be less likely to reach agreement about appropriate policies and less likely to concede the reasonableness of policies with which they disagree.

Proponents of this view have concluded that it requires a reconceptualization of the role of political executives. They reject the conventional definition of the leadership function, sometimes characterized as the "decisionist" perspective, in which the work of political executives is conceived as that of making calculated choices about the best way of responding to a policy problem (Shklar, 1964; Majone, 1989). Instead, they argue for a broader conception which Barber (1984:238-239; Landy, 1991:59) calls "facilitating leadership" in which political executives assume responsibility for fostering and managing deliberation on contentious issues. The argument in favor of this view is, in part, prudential. It is expected to make the job of governing easier by producing clearer mandates for governmental action and by persuading the public that policy goals have been chosen through a "fair process of deliberation" (Moore, 1983:19).

Advocates of this new view propose a variety of devices for improving public discourse on important issues. These include proposals for more extensive use of public consultive processes as well as the use of "citizen juries" (Crosby et al., 1986); electronic town meetings (Barber, 1984); national issues forums (Yankelovich, 1991; deliberative opinion polls (Fishkin, 1991); and neighborhood or workplace assemblies (Mamsbridge, 1980; Barber, 1984). However, many of these proposals remain untested and there is skepticism about their effectiveness in shaping public opinion and legitimating governmental policy decisions (Lascher, 1994; Roberts, 1994; Denver and Hands, 1993.

An important obstacle confronting proponents of these various schemes may be the unwillingness of print and electronic media to take them seriously. In many instances, these events are intended to generate extensive media coverage, thus spurring wider debate about the issue at hand and demonstrating to the broader public that policies have been chosen after a fair and open discussion.

However, these goals are unlikely to be achieved if media representatives downplay the significance of these events, cast doubt on the fairness with which the deliberations have been carried on, or decline to convey the substance of the discussions. Unfortunately, there is good reason to believe that media representatives will do this. Studies suggest that media coverage of political activities is tainted by disdain toward events which are perceived to be manufactured for media coverage (Levy, 1981; Boorstin, 1987), cynicism about the motives of political executives (Starobin, 1995), and a tendency to prefer stories about political "gamesmanship" over those which provide substantive analysis of issues (Patterson, 1994). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Style of Substance? Media Perceptions of Clinton's Economic and Timber Summits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.