State Private Property Rights Acts: The Potential for Implicating Federal Environmental Programs

By Cole, Ann L. Renhard | Texas Law Review, February 1998 | Go to article overview

State Private Property Rights Acts: The Potential for Implicating Federal Environmental Programs


Cole, Ann L. Renhard, Texas Law Review


State Private Property Rights Acts: The Potential for Implicating Federal Environmental Programs^

Introduction

In recent years, numerous states have passed Private Property Rights Acts (PPRAs). PPRAs attempt to provide a safeguard against private property restrictions and land devaluation resulting from certain government agency environmental and land use regulations. Although drafted to regulate state agency actions, PPRAs have the potential to implicate federal programs because federal statutes often delegate portions of environmental programs to the states to administer. An example of this type of delegation is the permitting program of the Clean Water Act. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has expressed concern over the possibility that Texas's PPRA could hinder the state's administration of certain delegated environmental programs. This concern may not remain focused on Texas alone: other states' PPRAs also hold the potential to threaten the administration of federally delegated environmental programs. This Note compares the language of three states' PPRAs: Montana, Utah, and Texas, and examines whether they can restrict federally delegated environmental programs as the EPA fears. A selection of only three states allows for a useful comparison of representative PPRA language. It also facilitates a detailed examination of the language of the acts-an examination that would be unmanageable if this Note attempted to address the language and implications of all state PPRAs.

The PPRAs of these three states are noteworthy for four reasons. First, these three acts represent the typical language variations found among PPRAs.1 Second, all three PPRAs specifically list "permitting" as a government action that could constitute a taking of private property, thereby potentially implicating federally delegated permitting programs.2 Third, the differences in language and structure among the three PPRAs may affect their interpretation concerning federally delegated environmental programs. Finally, of the numerous PPRAs introduced among the states, the PPRAs of Utah, Montana, and Texas all passed through their respective legislatures and continue to exist whereas a few other states have repealed their PPRAs.3

Part I of this Note introduces the problem and provides a brief history of state PPRAs. Part II compares the relevant language of the PPRAs of Montana, Utah, and Texas. Part III examines reasons why, in light of the language of the PPRAs, the EPA may be justified in its concerns over a state's ability to administer delegated permitting programs in the face of the PPRAs. Part IV suggests a way to remedy the effect PPRAs may have on federally delegated programs. Finally, Part V concludes by considering the implications of the EPA's current stance toward PPRAs and the status of state PPRAs in the future.

The Problem

In the past few years, many states have passed Private Property Rights Acts ( PPRAs) to ensure that state regulations will not result in a "taking" of private property. Central to all PPRAs is the provision that states conduct a "takings impact assessment"4 (TIA) prior to promulgating regulations. Such assessments require that agencies conduct an extensive review of any regulation that they propose. In conducting this review, agencies must analyze the burdens that the regulation may impose on a private property owner, examine less burdensome alternatives, and try to ensure that the regulation does not result in a "taking. "5 A state agency's failure to conduct an assessment may render the regulation void and provide a cause of action to an affected property owner.6 A few of the state PPRAs also specifically provide for compensation to landowners if a state action results in a "taking."7

PPRAs are the product of efforts by various property rights groups referred to collectively as the "Wise Use Movement. "8 The Movement is comprised of landowners (including farmers, ranchers, miners, and loggers), labor unions, industry groups, trade associations, developers, and even local government officials who became concerned over the increase in federal and state regulation of private lands spurred by 1970s environmental legislation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

State Private Property Rights Acts: The Potential for Implicating Federal Environmental Programs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.