The Role of Managerial Curiosity in Organizational Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry

By McIntyre, Nancy H.; Harvey, Michael et al. | International Journal of Management, June 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Role of Managerial Curiosity in Organizational Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry

McIntyre, Nancy H., Harvey, Michael, Moeller, Miriam, International Journal of Management

Organizational learning is a means to improve the chances of the organization surviving in today's highly competitive global marketplace. Organizational knowledge creation and knowledge transfer represent imperative for attaining and sustaining a competitive advantage in a global business environment. Yet, organizations are unable to learn unless the individuals in the organizations are committed to the learning process. Curiosity provides the platform for global managers to inquire into why things happen and what can be done to effectively meet the goals of the organization. Learning managers with curiosity need to heed the importance of their level of 'mindfulness' (i.e., focusing curiosity to meet goals) so that curiosity is an effective tool to learn and solve problems. This paper explores the concept of curiosity by linking individual curiosity and learning style to organizational learning. The traits/characteristics of 'knowledge activists' are discussed as a means to cultivate organizational learning.


In support of companies' (see Ernst and Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers, 3M, and FritoLay among others) talent searches, the global talent management literature (see Collings & Mellahi, 2009; Guthridge & Komm, 2008; Schuler, Jackson, & Tarique, 2011) posits curiosity, a managerial attribute, as a pivotal component of individual and consequently organizational learning. Inquisitiveness is a competence not many organizations are willing to sacrifice in a managerial candidate, as evidence has shown organizations' dependency upon such capabilities in order to attain and sustain a competitive advantage in the global marketplace. In today's global marketplace, the global organizational context is typified by an increased propensity to question existing norms and seeking alternative explanation to problems.

It is precisely the lack of experience and level of formal training relative to global issues that may hamper global decision-making self-efficacy (Harvey, Novicevic, Leonard, & Payne, 2007), and thus trigger the need for global management with curious minds. The literature has articulated the need for clever, creative, and constantly curious individuals (Isabella & Spekman, 2001), whereby curiosity [has been] conceptualized as a "positive emotional-motivation system associated with the recognition, pursuit, and self-regulation of novelty and challenge" (Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004, p. 291).

Curiosity is assumed to be one of the vital components of organizational learning. While most theorists acknowledge that organizational learning cannot occur without individual knowledge creation and knowledge sharing, how this might occur or what role individuals might play in this process has not been systematically investigated (Simon, 1991). Little support has been provided that speaks to the viability of curiosity as a driver of individual learning. This manuscript sets out to explore the following: What are the mechanisms by which individual learning is stimulated? Moreover, how may we capitalize on these mechanisms to foster greater levels of organizational learning?

The manuscript adopts Nonaka and Takeuchi's (1 995) SECI (socialization, externalization, combination, and internationalization) framework for creating organizational knowledge. Extending their assertions, the manuscript posits that human capital and the development of individual knowledge is pivotal in the global organizational learning process. Kolb's (1984) assists in making this claim. Kolb's learning theory suggests that learning per se is the result of the interaction of two matters: 1 .) the individual; and 2.) their surrounding environment. KoIb specifically proposed a process model of learning and classification scheme of types of learners, whereby learning is suggested to occur somewhere along the continuum from active experimentation through reflective observation and concrete experience through abstract conceptualization.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Role of Managerial Curiosity in Organizational Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?