Negotiating Professional Identities in Higher Education: Dilemmas and Priorities of Academic Staff

By Calvert, Mike; Lewis, Thérèse et al. | Research in Education, November 2011 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Negotiating Professional Identities in Higher Education: Dilemmas and Priorities of Academic Staff


Calvert, Mike, Lewis, Thérèse, Spindler, John, Research in Education


Introduction

The project offers a case study of academic stafffrom one faculty in an English Higher Education Institution. What started out as a management exercise in identifying how staffspent their time, was re-conceptualised as practitioner research exploring the complexities of how academic staffsustain professional identities and the implications for how they prioritised the various aspects of their work. The aim of the project was, therefore, to investigate the work patterns of academic staffand, with particular reference to professional identity, to illuminate how they prioritise competing demands. An additional 'development dimension' was intended to promote discussion and debate amongst academic staffto generate new perspectives and new ways to address dilemmas inherent in the competing demands on their time.

First, we briefly outline the context for the case study in terms of the University, Faculty, staffbackground and composition. Secondly, there is a short summary of key elements of the methodology and of the methods used for the collection and analysis of data. Thirdly, we outline some theoretical resources that we have found helpful in our efforts to construct meaning from the data. Fourthly, we present our account of how participants have experienced dilemmas in their day-to-day work. This involves an exploration of tensions between what academic stafffeel they ought to do, what they feel obliged to do and what they feel is possible. Finally, we summarise the paper by drawing out some of the key strands that have emerged from the project so far.

Context

The University began its life as a Church of England College in 1841 to train teachers 'of the working poor'. Throughout its history it has been mainly associated with teacher education although it has diversified substantially in recent times. The University has approaching 6,000 students and the School of Education and Theology represents the largest faculty in terms of student numbers. It is a teaching-led (rather than research-intensive) institution with a strong vocational bias addressing the needs of the 'real' world (Harley, 2002).

The work is centred around the teaching of large numbers of predominantly undergraduate students and postgraduate (PGCE) students training to be teachers. Teacher education is funded by Central Government to tightly regulated standards and with a robust inspection regime OfSTED (Office for Standards in Education). The courses are popular and the University has a strong reputation for its teacher education.

The University does not receive research grants from the funding bodies and has little research funding to draw upon. As a result, the research base is, understandably, relatively low. Taught masters courses are offered in Education and Theology and there are a small number of research students. The research activity is growing from a low base. There is now a greater emphasis on research and scholarship and a number of staffaspiring to and attaining higher degrees have brought about this change over the last five years.

Most academic staffin the faculty, as is common in teacher education departments, began their careers in schools often having distinguished themselves in their teaching and/or management role in the compulsory education sector. They can be said to have excelled as practitioners and that, as a rule, was the reason for their appointment. A number are ex-heads or have been senior managers or curriculum advisers. Some of the Theology staffare also qualified teachers, as incidentally so too are several of the administrative staff. The common provenance of the staffand their shared history combined with the fact that they are, mainly, preparing students for a career in teaching might have quite a bearing on their professional identities. Staffdefine themselves primarily as teachers and their professional identity is strongly bounded by their shared background.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Negotiating Professional Identities in Higher Education: Dilemmas and Priorities of Academic Staff
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?