The Private Provision of Public Goods: An Analysis of Homes on Golf Courses

By Limehouse, Frank F.; McCormick, Robert E. et al. | Journal of Private Enterprise, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Private Provision of Public Goods: An Analysis of Homes on Golf Courses


Limehouse, Frank F., McCormick, Robert E., Yeoh, Melissa M., Journal of Private Enterprise


Abstract

This paper examines the joint production of golf and real estate development. The empirical results of this analysis show that, over time, golf courses are being constructed less for recreational golf and more for contractual assurance of green open space for homes. We believe that this fundamentally provides some evidence that the demand for environmental quality is growing and that markets are increasingly able to find creative contracting mechanisms to satisfy demands for public goods.

JEL Codes: H49, Q56, R31

Keywords: Golf; Real estate; Environmental quality

I. Introduction

As people and economies grow richer, they demand enhanced environmental quality. At least that seems to be one of the noncontroversial conclusions that can be reached from economic analysis of environmental Kuznets curves (Yandle et al., 2004). Green space initiatives are increasingly common on the political landscape, and the issue is full of economics, politics, emotion, and opinion. Therefore, we start from the position that there is some fledgling demand for people to sequester or otherwise prevent the development of certain areas, particularly those near housing. These areas are being preserved as open, pasture, wooded, prairie, or raw land and not converted into commercial or residential development. We propose that homes on golf courses may be an entrepreneurial attempt at supplying the joint provision of golf courses along with housing on desirable green spaces.

It is fair to say that economic analysts, pundits, and lay people have long argued that the private, free market may regularly fail to provide public goods such as green space, open space, parks, and similar environmental amenities owing to the public goods and free rider problem. While that may very well be true, we think a second look may reveal that the growing demand for these environmental assets may be met in unusual ways by private, profit-oriented entrepreneurs.

We believe that there is a significant, private, demand for environmental amenities that grows as people become wealthier. Hence we study how markets and contract solutions might come to meet this demand. We do this in two seemingly separate but actually similar contexts: the demand for open, green space and the demand for golf. One important caveat is in order. We do not intend to argue or present evidence that the socially optimal level of collective goods is created or produced by private demanders, but rather, that markets are not barren when it comes to the provision of these public goods. This is not a normative analysis.

This paper explores whether golf courses may be substitutes for natural open green space in the eyes of some consumers and to some extent satisfy their demands for environmental quality. Simply, are golf courses today being constructed, in part, not only for people to play golf, but also to provide open green space to adjacent home owners? We remain agnostic on, and it is not the point of our paper, whether golf courses are superior to alternative forms of green spacing such as conservation easements, deed covenants, taxation and regulation, or similar devices.

We start from the following factual basis. Golf course construction proceeds at an unusually high rate given the growth in the number of people playing golf or the amount of golf being played. In 2000, an estimated 56,000 new homes on golf courses were constructed at a total cost of $8.4 billion, and they make up approximately 4 percent of the total 1 .5 million homes constructed in the United States (Golf 20/20, 2003). In fact, the golf industry laments with some ever-increasing agony the continuing construction of courses with no concomitant apparent increase in the demand for golf:

Hit with a shot of bad weather and a surge in the construction of new courses, many golf course owners across Wisconsin are struggling to stay below par. "We are definitely saturated in terms of courses," said Terianne Petzold, executive director of the Golf Course Owners of Wisconsin, a Milwaukee-based industry group.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Private Provision of Public Goods: An Analysis of Homes on Golf Courses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?