The Nearly Neutral and Selection Theories of Molecular Evolution under the Fisher Geometrical Framework: Substitution Rate, Population Size, and Complexity

By Razeto-Barry, Pablo; Díaz, Javier et al. | Genetics, June 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Nearly Neutral and Selection Theories of Molecular Evolution under the Fisher Geometrical Framework: Substitution Rate, Population Size, and Complexity


Razeto-Barry, Pablo, Díaz, Javier, Vásquez, Rodrigo A., Genetics


ABSTRACT The general theories of molecular evolution depend on relatively arbitrary assumptions about the relative distribution and rate of advantageous, deleterious, neutral, and nearly neutral mutations. The Fisher geometrical model (FGM) has been used to make distributions of mutations biologically interpretable. We explored an FGM-based molecular model to represent molecular evolutionary processes typically studied by nearly neutral and selection models, but in which distributions and relative rates of mutations with different selection coefficients are a consequence of biologically interpretable parameters, such as the average size of the phenotypic effect of mutations and the number of traits (complexity) of organisms. A variant of the FGM-based model that we called the static regime (SR) represents evolution as a nearly neutral process in which substitution rates are determined by a dynamic substitution process in which the population's phenotype remains around a suboptimum equilibrium fitness produced by a balance between slightly deleterious and slightly advantageous compensatory substitutions. As in previous nearly neutral models, the SR predicts a negative relationship between molecular evolutionary rate and population size; however, SR does not have the unrealistic properties of previous nearly neutral models such as the narrow window of selection strengths in which they work. In addition, the SR suggests that compensatory mutations cannot explain the high rate of fixations driven by positive selection currently found in DNA sequences, contrary to what has been previously suggested. We also developed a generalization of SR in which the optimum phenotype can change stochastically due to environmental or physiological shifts, which we called the variable regime (VR). VR models evolution as an interplay between adaptive processes and nearly neutral steady-state processes. When strong environmental fluctuations are incorporated, the process becomes a selection model in which evolutionary rate does not depend on population size, but is critically dependent on the complexity of organisms and mutation size. For SR as well as VR we found that key parameters of molecular evolution are linked by biological factors, and we showed that they cannot be fixed independently by arbitrary criteria, as has usually been assumed in previous molecular evolutionary models.

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)

THE nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution (Ohta and Kimura 1971; Ohta 1972, 1973, 1977, 1992, 1996), as is generally understood, affirms that the vast majority of amino acid substitutions are slightly deleterious; hence, it has been called the slightly deleterious mutation theory (Figure 1C) (Ohta and Kimura 1971; Ohta 1972, 1973, 1977, 1987, 1996; Kimura 1983; Gillespie 1995, 2004; Kreitman 1996). In the original exponential "shift" model of Ohta (1977) selection coefficients are chosen at random from an exponential probability distribution, and the population mean fitness shifts back when a mutation is fixed (see also Ohta and Gillespie 1996). This model was modified by Kimura (1979), who proposed the gamma shiftmodel, to overcome Ohta's previous assumptions that imply a rate of substitution that is too low when population size is increased above moderate values (see also Nielsen and Yang 2003). Later, Ohta and Tachida (1990) and Tachida (1991) developed another kind of nearly neutral model to relax some criticized assumptions (see below), but those models produced a very different prediction than that of slightly deleterious mutation models. In fact, Gillespie (1994, 1995) uncovered that in these later models, known as the house-of-cards or "fixed" models, only half of the substitutions are deleterious and the other half are advantageous (see also Tachida 1996, 2000). Thus, these kinds of nearly neutral models may be subsumed in a different category that we will call the balanced mutation theory (Figure 1D).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Nearly Neutral and Selection Theories of Molecular Evolution under the Fisher Geometrical Framework: Substitution Rate, Population Size, and Complexity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?