Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Psychological Entrapment and Women's Commitment to Violent Dating Relationships

By Katz, Jennifer; Tirone, Vanessa et al. | Violence and Victims, July 1, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Psychological Entrapment and Women's Commitment to Violent Dating Relationships

Katz, Jennifer, Tirone, Vanessa, Schukrafft, Melanie, Violence and Victims

Psychological entrapment occurs when people continue investing in unfavorable situations after already devoting too much to lose. We predicted that women who already invested more time and resources into their relationships would exert effort to improve their relationships following partner violence. In turn, these efforts were expected to increase women's subjective investment in, and thus, commitment to violent relationships. Undergraduate women (N = 98) in heterosexual relationships reported on partner violence and relationship duration at Time 1 and relationship sacrifices, subjective investment, and commitment at Times 1 and 2. As expected, women with violent partners who were in longer term relationships sacrificed more 6 weeks later. Unexpectedly, in multivariate analyses, Time 2 sacrifices were not significantly associated with Time 2 subjective investment, although subjective investment was positively associated with concurrent commitment. These results provide preliminary evidence for women's entrapment in violent relationships.

Keywords: investment model; intimate partner violence; sacrifice; relationship duration; commitment

Intimate partner violence (IPV) involves many harmful behaviors, including physical assault, rape, and stalking. Based on the National Violence Against Women Survey (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000), the most common form of IPV reported by women is the use of violence intended to inflict bodily harm. About 18.9% of the sample reported physical assault. The three most common types of violence were being pushed, grabbed, or shoved (82%); slapped or hit (78%); or beaten up (44%). Consequences of partner violence included fear of physical injury, actual injury (including broken bones, sprains, bruising), time lost from work, and increased need for both medical and mental health treatment (Miller, 2006; Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000).

Although many studies of IPV focus on married or cohabiting couples, physical violence may be even more common within dating couples. For example, the International Dating Violence Study (Straus, 2004b) documented that between 17% and 49% of college students at each of 31 sites worldwide reported perpetrating dating violence over the past year, with a 29% median rate. About one quarter of the assaults caused injury, with injury especially common in cases of men's violence against women. Dating partner violence also was associated with poorer mental health, including depression and suicidal ideation (Chan, Straus, Brownridge, Tiwari, & Leung, 2008). These findings converge with smaller studies from the United States. For example, Rhatigan and Street (2005) found that 28.7% of undergraduate women reported at least one act of physical violence from their male dating partner in the past year. Similarly, Banyard and Cross (2008) reported that dating violence was associated with depression and suicidal thoughts among adolescent girls. Clearly, many young women experience violence in dating relationships, with concomitant risk for physical and emotional harm.

Women in violent relationships also face social stigma. More specifically, victims of IPV are often judged by others as flawed, deviant, weak, or incompetent, especially if they stay with their partners (e.g., Ben-Ari, Winstok, & Eisikovits, 2003). Yet, the decision to leave a violent relationship is affected by many factors including external barriers (e.g., finances) and psychological characteristics of the relationship and victim (e.g., Barnett, 2001). Furthermore, because separating from a violent partner may increase risk for IPV (e.g., Brownridge, 2006), women are at risk for repeated victimization regardless of whether they choose to stay or leave.

Despite potential risks associated with leaving, in most cases, leaving a violent dating relationship is most likely to foster women's long-term physical and emotional well-being (Rhatigan, Street, & Axsom, 2006). However, because leaving is a complex process, research is needed to identify precursors of leaving, including factors that predict commitment to partners.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Psychological Entrapment and Women's Commitment to Violent Dating Relationships


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?