The 'R' Files

By Moran, Alan | Review - Institute of Public Affairs, December 2002 | Go to article overview

The 'R' Files


Moran, Alan, Review - Institute of Public Affairs


Blueprint for a Living Continent: Australia's Latest Attempt at Self-Destruction

At regular intervals, groups of activists and scientists declare that modern agriculture is destroying the natural environment. According to the refrain, not only do current practices destroy natural attractions, but they also undermine the land's productive capacity.

Although the claims may be put forward by people with scientific and economic knowledge, this is overwhelmed by their `commitment to the cause'. Moreover, the claimants' prescriptions will usually enthrone them as environmental dictators.

The latest such warning, Blueprint for a Living Continent, was issued by the so-called Wentworth Group, largely comprising activists on the payroll of government or with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). The report prescribes government spending of $3.6 billion over the next decade. This is both to provide a contribution in its own right and to induce an additional $12.7 billion of private spending on transforming the agricultural system. Ambitious though $16 billion appears, it is modest when compared with the ambit claim hatched by Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) and National Farmers Federation (NFF) involving a $65 billion fund.1

The Wentworth Group sees us heading towards a precipice. It claims that:

* `two thirds of landholders report that their property values will decline by up to 25% over the next three to five years';

* dryland salinity is rising and `could affect' 22 per cent of cultivated land, and that the sustainability of our agriculture is under threat.

Even though these sentences are ominously pregnant, close reading reveals them to be sensationalist factoids, devoid of any real meaning. Thus

* Landowners think their property values could fall by up to 25 per cent;

* Dryland salinity could affect 22 per cent of cultivated land.

On these flimsy foundations, the report proceeds to erect a superstructure forged from evocative phrases such as these:

* `Salt destroying our rivers and land like a cancer.'

* `Many of our native plants and animals are heading for extinction.'

* `About 50,000 km of streams have been degraded by sand deposition and sediments are moving off hill slopes much faster than soil is formed.'

* `We are taking more resources out of our continent than its natural systems can replenish.'

The jeremiad is redolent of Theodore Roosevelt who, in 1911, said,

... the time has come to enquire seriously what will happen when our forests are gone, ... when the soils have been further impoverished and washed into streams, polluting the rivers, denuding the fields and obstructing navigation.

Yet, not one of Roosevelt's anxieties has proved well founded. America (like Australia) now has more forest than in 1911, its soils are more fertile and its rivers less polluted. All this has occurred in tandem with an increasingly productive agricultural sector.

Roosevelt was reliant on patchy agricultural output statistics in arriving at his misconceptions. The Wentworth Group has no such excuse. It did not take the time to examine the data on Australian agricultural output. This has shown real growth of 2-3 per cent per annum in every decade since the 1950s, notwithstanding dark forebodings from many Wentworth Groupies that have dominated the debate for more than 20 years.

Drought in the current year will force agricultural production down by ten per cent. But this is a natural phenomenon unrelated to any human actions. It signals no trend. Indeed, with genetic modification of crops still in its infancy, an upward kink in productivity growth is likely from greater pesticide tolerance, lower water usage and increased useable output.

Having set up its straw man, the Wentworth Group offers its solutions. Predictably, none of those include genetic modification-- clearly new technology like this is unacceptable to the WWF, while CSIRO apparently has no compunction in remaining silent if it means a funding boost. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The 'R' Files
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.