Attitudes toward Tax Evasion: A Demographic Study of South African Attitudes on Tax Evasion

By Ross, Adriana M.; McGee, Robert W. | Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, September 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

Attitudes toward Tax Evasion: A Demographic Study of South African Attitudes on Tax Evasion


Ross, Adriana M., McGee, Robert W., Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research


ABSTRACT

A number of studies have examined the relationship between tax collection and various demographic variables. However, until recently most of those studies have involved a United States sample population. The Internal Revenue Service provides demographic data for researchers on a regular basis. The present study goes beyond those studies in several important ways. For one, it uses data on South Africa taken from the World Values database. Not much work has been done on the South African tax or public finance system. Thus, the present study expands on the very limited research done on South African public finance.

The present study expands on existing literature in at least two other ways as well. For one, it examines how various demographics interact with attitudes toward tax evasion. Secondly, we examine several demographic variables that were not examined in prior studies.

One of the questions in the World Values database asked whether it would be justifiable to cheat on taxes if it were possible to do so. Respondents were asked to choose a number from 1 to 10 to indicate the extent of their support for tax evasion. This study examines those responses, both overall and through the prism of more than 20 demographic variables. A trend analysis is also done to determine whether South African attitudes regarding tax evasion have changed in recent years. A comparison is made with other ethical issues to determine the relative seriousness of tax evasion.

The study found that attitudes toward the justifiability of tax evasion often do vary by demographic variable. Tax evasion was found to be a less serious offense than accepting a bribe, suicide or wife beating, equally as serious as prostitution, and more serious than receiving government benefits to which you are not entitled, avoiding a fare on public transport or euthanasia. The trend of opinion on the justifiability of tax evasion has been nonlinear. It is more acceptable in the most recent survey than it was in 1996 but less acceptable than it was in 1990 or 2001.

Although the present study focuses on South Africa, the methodology used in the present study could serve as a template for research on other countries or regions.

INTRODUCTION

Tax evasion has been in existence ever since the first person with sufficient authority attempted to extract tribute from some local population (Adams, 1982, 1993; Webber & Wildavsky, 1986). The topic of tax evasion has become multidisciplinary over the decades, expanding from economics and public finance journals into the fields of accounting, taxation, law, sociology, psychology and other behavioral sciences.

The present study focuses on attitudes toward tax evasion in South Africa. Not many studies have been made of South African public finance and even fewer of attitudes toward tax evasion in South Africa. One study that was made of South African attitudes toward tax evasion was a survey of 191 South African university business students (McGee & Goldman, 2010). That survey included a survey instrument that listed 1 8 arguments that had been used to justify tax evasion through history. Students were asked to choose a number from one to seven to indicate the extent of their agreement or disagreement with each statement.

The strongest argument to justify tax evasion was in cases where a large portion of the money collected was wasted. The second strongest argument was in cases where the tax system was perceived to be unfair. The next two strongest arguments had to do with oppressive governments - where the taxpayer lived in a repressive regime such as Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia, or where the government discriminates because of race, religion or ethnic background.

Other strong arguments justifying tax evasion were in cases where the taxpayer was unable to pay, where the government imprisons people for their political opinions, where a significant portion of the money collected winds up in the pockets of corrupt politicians, their friends and families, where the proceeds go to support an unjust war, where tax rates are too high or where funds are spent on projects that the taxpayer morally disapproves of. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Attitudes toward Tax Evasion: A Demographic Study of South African Attitudes on Tax Evasion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.