A GPS for Social Impact

By McCreless, Michael; Trelstad, Brian | Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A GPS for Social Impact


McCreless, Michael, Trelstad, Brian, Stanford Social Innovation Review


Root Capital and Acumen Fund propose a system for program evaluation that is akin to GPS by Michael mccreless & brian trelstad

Measuring social impact is a quixotic pursuit. We both should know. Over the last several years, each of us has worked at leading social investment funds - Root Capital and Acumen Fund - measuring, managing, and communicating the social impact of our respective organizations' investment portfolios. We have done a reasonable job counting outputs and aligning our performance with our own and other impact funds through the adoption of the Impact Reporting and Investment Standards (IRIS). But the social entrepreneur or investor who seeks to measure the real social impact of his investments needs information about how people's lives changed as a result of a project or product, against the nonexistent counterfactual of what would have happened without it.

These changes are often unobservable, as in the case of improvements in a program recipient's well-being. When the changes are observable, they may not be quantifiable. Even when they are quantifiable, they are denominated in different cultural and economic "currencies." How can one compare a long-lasting bed net that protects a Kenyan child against malaria to a loan to a small-scale farmer to buy fertilizer that improves crop yield and increases income?

Yet we know social impact when we see it, and when program recipients or consumers experience it. A to ? Textiles, one of the investees of Acumen Fund, manufactures insecticide-treated bed nets that the Tanzanian Ministry of Health distributes to rural areas. We have seen the malaria infection rate decrease there, but we don't know exactly how many cases of malaria were prevented, and we never will. Do we need to know precisely? Perhaps not. There is a danger in our desire for precision. It distracts us from attainable and accurate estimates of social impact, when in most situations, accuracy ("the truth") is more important than precision (calculating estimates to two decimal points).

The distinction matters because the problem of social impart measurement is unsolvable precisely, but quite solvable imprecisely and accurately. Many impart assessment methodologies seek to create a single estimate that is both precise and accurate. We have found that most of these methodologies are too expensive or complex to scale across a large number of projects, while lighter touch methodologies are often imprecise, inaccurate, or both. This leads to a sense among practitioners of being stuck. No matter how we try to measure social impart, either the data are unavailable or we cannot accept the results as fact, knowing how much fudge went into the calculation.

ESTIMATING IMPACT

Even as experts continue to refine existing impact methodologies, we as practitioners must work to increase the rigor with which we combine information from multiple methodologies to tell a compelling and accurate story. By combining the information contained in several imperfect but practical estimators, we can triangulate a more accurate estimate of the impart of our work. We liken this process of triangulation to a global positioning system (GPS), which combines the signals from multiple satellites to triangulate a fairly precise estimate of one's position on the face of the Earth.

The analogy is simple. In theory, scientists could design a GPS in which three satellites could determine the location of a GPS receiver anywhere in the world, estimating latitude, longitude, and elevation simultaneously. In reality commercial GPS units use signals from up to 10 satellites to correct for measurement error in calculations based on the first three signals. By combining information from multiple sources, global positioning systems can overcome their own limitations to triangulate highly accurate estimates of a position.

Acumen Fund and Root Capital are two leading impact investing funds that aspire to generate exceptional social impact and a financial return by investing in enterprises that benefit the poor in developing countries.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A GPS for Social Impact
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?