The Relationship between Personality Traits and Information Competency in Korean and American Students

By Song, Hana; Kwon, Nahyun | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, August 10, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Relationship between Personality Traits and Information Competency in Korean and American Students


Song, Hana, Kwon, Nahyun, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


We examined differences between Korean and American cultures in terms of the relationships between Big Five personality traits (McCrae & Costa, 1990) and information competency. Korean (n = 245) and American (n = 185) college students completed the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and the Information Competency Scale (Kwon, 2010). Results showed both similarities and differences between the 2 culture groups. Conscientiousness and openness to experience significantly predicted information competency in both Korean and American students. However, the influence of extraversion was significant only for American students. This result may be because of the high value placed on extraversion in American culture.

Keywords: cultural differences, information competency, Big Five personality traits, NEO-Five Factor Inventory, college students.

Information competency, or ability and confidence in searching and using information (American Library Association, 2000), is one of the most important skills in the 21st century. Researchers have examined the role of personality traits as a mechanism for the development of information behaviors and competency (Haider, Roy, & Chakraborty, 2010; Heinström, 2003, 2006). In particular, the Big Five personality traits of extraversion, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, as proposed by McCrae and Costa (1990), have become widely accepted among many personality trait theories.

In previous studies, researchers have reported the significant influence of extraversion and openness to experience on the search for information, in that people who were more extroverted and open to experience tended to search for information more extensively and effectively (Haider et al., 2010; Heinström, 2003, 2006). We carried out the first research into the influence of the Big Five personality traits on information competency and found that conscientiousness was the strongest predictor of information competency in the American college students' culture (Kwon & Song, 2011). However, in our earlier study we did not deal with information competency in other cultural contexts.

The latest trend in globalization has been to increase understanding of cultural diversity in information behaviors and technology (Jackson et al., 2008). At the same time, cultural variability has been a challenging issue when studying personality traits (McCrae, 2001). However, the relationship between these two topics has not yet been fully investigated in non- Western cultures. Thus, our primary purpose in this study was to examine differences between Western and non- Western cultures in regard to the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and information competency. Specifically, we compared the American and Korean cultures in this study.

Like other East Asian cultures, Korean culture has been considerably influenced by Confucian traditions. Perhaps cultural differences between Korea and the US can be attributed to the Confucian traditions. One such difference between the two cultures is individualism versus collectivism. Western cultures are generally characterized as individualistic, whereas most Asian cultures are described as collectivist (Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002). Although both individualist and collectivist cultures value self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997), self-confidence seems to be valued in Western cultures. For example, in studies of competency researchers have reported that students and adults in highly individualistic cultures had a stronger tendency to perceive themselves as competent compared with those in collectivist cultures (Earley, Gibson, & Chen, 1999; Klassen, 2004). In the same cultural contexts, self-perceived competence regarding academic achievement has been found to be lower among Asian-American students than among American students who were not Asian (Eaton & Dembo, 1997). It has been suggested that individualism might contribute to the development of a sense of competency more strongly than does collectivism (see e.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Relationship between Personality Traits and Information Competency in Korean and American Students
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?