The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic

By Meladze, Victor | The Journal of Psychohistory, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic


Meladze, Victor, The Journal of Psychohistory


Chalmers Johnson, The Sonows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New York, Henry Holt and Company, 2004.

Reviewed by Victor Meladze

The awareness that the United States' economy and democratic foundations have been hijacked by the U.S. military-industrial complex and that the nation is in danger of demise is shared by a growing number of scholars and lay persons alike. In The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers Johnson fortifies this perspective with wealth of evidence that the United States has transformed into an Orwellian-like global military dictatorship, with an unscrupulous power elite subculture, that has driven America beyond the historical and geopolitical parameters where averting a mathematical end is possible. America, according to Chalmers, is strapped to a war economy and is inextricably bound to historical laws of mortality- much like ancient Rome and all past militarized empires.

Unlike some scholars, such as Bacevich (Washington Rules, 2010), who have traced the roots of U.S. militarization and imperialism to the Second World War, Johnson argues that the seeds of America's current global military dominance were planted in the early nineteenth century. Johnson cites the genocide that was perpetrated against Native Americans by the U.S. government and the usurpation of Latin America within its spheres of influence as reflective of the early stems of later U.S. global expansionism. According to Johnson, the steady depletion of America's democratic principles and the advent of the "imperial presidency" have been a long time in the making. Johnson accurately marks the rise of the U.S. global military hegemony in the infernal days of the Second World War. He also notes that the U.S. population's fear of the Soviet Union in the post-Second World War era was exploited by the elements of the nation's power structure. The Cold War was fueled, according to Johnson, by the collective need to contain the spread of Communism and facilitated the unprecedented expansion of U.S. military presence around the globe.

Johnson, like many scholars, advances the view that the U.S. government and its far-flung national security apparatus (i.e., Pentagon and U.S. military establishment) is in collusion with profit-driven big oil organizations, multinational corporations and private contracting firms. According to Johnson, this vast network of elite power players, private sub-groups, governmental agencies and the U.S. military have created an insular and secretive world that is dangerously uninhibited by the constraints of international law. Although Johnson's work is woefully bereft of psychological, psychoanalytic and psychohistorical theories on why America's elites have formed an alternate sub-culture (i.e., separate narrative/"group illusion," delegated enemies/affies, laws and legal privileges) from the U.S. society he does utilize the sociological perspective of Max Weber on the dynamics of bureaucracies. Johnson quotes from Weber's classic work Economy and Society (1922) to explain the elite group mind set:

"Every bureaucracy seeks to increase the superiority of the professionally informed by keeping their knowledge and intentions secret. Bureaucratic administration always tends to be an administration of `secret sessions': insofar as it can, it hides its knowledge and actions from criticism.... The concept of the `offidal secret' is the specific invention of the bureaucracy, and nothing is so fanatically defended by the bureaucracy as this attitude In facing a parliament the bureaucracy, out of sure power instinct, fights every attempt of the parliament to gain knowledge by means of its own experts or interest groups.... Bureaucracy naturally welcomes a poorly-informed and hence a powerless parliament - at least insofar as ignorance somehow agrees with the bureaucracy's interests."

According to Johnson, Weber's sociologically-based assessment of the bureaucratic group-mind parallels the machinations of today's U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.