Major Book Reviews -- Gaia and God: A Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing by Rosemary Radford Ruether

By Rolston, Holmes, III | Interpretation, April 1994 | Go to article overview

Major Book Reviews -- Gaia and God: A Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing by Rosemary Radford Ruether


Rolston, Holmes, III, Interpretation


GAIA AND GOD: AN ECOFEMINIST THEOLOGY OF EARTH HEALING, Rosemary Radford Ruether. HarperSanFransisco/HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 1992. 310 pp. $22.00. ISBN 0-06-067022-3.

Gaia and God is an admirably readable, wide-ranging account of world-views, claiming that the past has been too patriarchal and that the present needs a feminist corrective. Each of four sections--creation, destruction, domination and deceit, and healing--starts in past mythology, in religion, and ends in a contemporary descriptive account, typically with much science. Ruether's goal is prescriptive and therapeutic. There are three classical creation stories: Babylonian, Hebrew, and Greek, and there is the modern scientific story. There are biblical destructions: the Noah story, prophetic apocalyptic, and the Book of Revelation, somewhat oddly juxtaposed with the ecological crisis as religious "fantasy" versus ecological "reality" (p. 115).

Ruether gives a sociological account of the religious world-views: They are not really descriptions of nature or of impending world events but rather projections of social forces. They are "blueprints" (p. 33) for legitimating behavior; these myths are one social power structure establishing itself, or protesting, against another. Since the advent of science, changes in the scientific picture interlock with changes in the social blueprints. This explains the intensity of the struggle with Galileo, since the changed astronomical picture upset humans as the focus of God's attention and the church heirarchy as the mediator of that attention. This happens again with Darwin.

Ruether is principally interested in the social forces by which males dominate females. The Hebrew creation narrative puts human beings in dominion over the earth and women as helpers to men, though human beings are also ecological stewards. Western history unfolds this vision, forgetting the constraints, and resulting in our present crisis of exploitation without caring.

This rubric fits the scientific creation less well, however, because the stories of "the big bang" and that of evolutionary history describe events that occurred long before humans were on earth. It is hard to see what social forces they are being used to legitimate, though it is easy to see how they upset social blueprints. Even here, however, Ruether manages to find men at work; that is why the primeval event is termed "the big bang," rather than, more agreeably with a feminist perspective, "the cosmic egg." "The masculinist bias undoubtedly also operated here in the choice of a metaphor of destructive violence, rather than of gestation and birth" (p. 57). Well, maybe, but we really have little experience of eggs that hatch by flying apart from an infinite singularity at temperature of 10 sup -33 degrees, with a fantastically dense sea of hot quarks undergoing an instant inflation in the first 10 sup -43 seconds, expanding thereafter for twenty billion years. Likewise, men are at work in the Darwinian accounts; that is why the competition side of nature is overemphasized and the cooperation side is underemphasized. Men like destruction; women like interdependency (pp. 55-58).

In the section on domination and deceit, Ruether worries that men have named what is evil. "This false naming of evil as physical and social otherness, and the efforts of dominant males to secure themselves against evil by separating themselves from this otherness, creates ideologies that justify the doing of evil to others as a means of overcoming evil." Our accounts of evil "have been constructed from the vantage point of dominant males in a way that has functioned to justify their violent power over women, other subjugated people, and the earth" (p. 116). The idea seems to be that men incorrectly connected sin with "finitude," whereas sin is "the misuse of freedom to exploit other humans and the earth" (p. 141), a temptation against which men, misperceiving sin, were inadequately protected. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Major Book Reviews -- Gaia and God: A Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing by Rosemary Radford Ruether
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.