Undoing Whiteness in the Classroom: Critical Educultural Teaching Approaches for Social Justice Activism
Burkholder, Casey, McGill Journal of Education (Online)
Virginia Lea & Erma Jean Sims (Eds .). Undoing whiteness in the classroom: Critical educultural teaching approaches for social justice activism. New York, NY: Peter Lang. (2008). 276 pp. $35.95 (Paperback). (ISBN: 978-0-82049-712-9).
What do we talk about when we talk about "whiteness"? What does it mean to "undo" or unlearn whiteness? Emerging from the critical and theoretical discussion of whiteness as a category that signifies the structural, cultural, economic and political advantages and privileges that come from appearing to have "white" or lighter skin (see Carr, 2008; Dei, Karumanchery & Karumanchery-Luik, 2004; Lipsitz, 2006; Wray, 2006), Virginia Lea and Erma Jean Sims' Undoing Whiteness promotes art as a critical pedagogical tool to work through social justice issues in the American classroom. The editors clearly identify the purpose of this collection: to challenge the increasingly mainstreamed and standardized curricula, assessments, and instruction which whitewash over the myriad of ethnic, socioeconomic, cultural and gendered differences (to name only a few intersections) in contemporary American schools through critical "educulturalism." Educulturalism uses art-based methodologies that encourage learners to unlock the "unconscious," to explore and understand the construction of the social and cultural status quo, and to develop their agency, "insight and voice" (p. 18; see also Roediger, 2006; Sleeter, 2005; Tabb, 2006). Critical educultural education works to challenge the inequitable practices that marginalize those who do not fit into the category of whiteness.
Lea and Sims employ the term whiteness to address the privilege that an uneven amount of white people have systematically benefitted from, rather than qualifying the word whiteness with the word "hegemony" (p. 2). As such, the editors refrain from diminishing potential intersections between class and race, gender, sexuality, language use, etc., as not all white people benefit from Lea and Sims' particular definition of whiteness. Lea and Sims' collection is embedded within a distinctively American historical and political context, but looks also to Canada through Karen McGarry's chapter which destabilizes whiteness and challenges the "myth" of Canadian multiculturalism (p. 122).
Undoing Whiteness in the Classroom is organized into 14 chapters that theorize hegemonic whiteness as it is enacted in school (Chapters 1-2), and how it is overcome through the use of arts-based teaching methods that use poetry, children's literature, music, film, visual art and performance (Chapters 3-6; 9-10). The remaining chapters (Chapters 7-8; 11-14) focus on a critical analysis of the "cultural shape we're in" (p. 203), employing Mesoamerican pedagogy to teach for justice, and critically examining the self (and our assumptions) to undo whiteness.
One of the strengths of the collection is its tangible application to the classroom; it demands the fusing of theory and practice. In Chapter 3, Lea and Sims use poetry to identify and decenter whiteness, citing the power of subjectivity that poetry explores through the example of Manyarrows' 1995 poem, See No Indian, Hear No Indian. Manyarrows' poem names the hurt of colonialism, the politics of remembering, and the telling of hurtful memories, which encourages empathy and demands reconciliation for …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Undoing Whiteness in the Classroom: Critical Educultural Teaching Approaches for Social Justice Activism. Contributors: Burkholder, Casey - Author. Journal title: McGill Journal of Education (Online). Volume: 47. Issue: 2 Publication date: Spring 2012. Page number: 251+. © Faculty of Education of McGill University Spring 2009. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.